Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Pattersons (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Screaming Pattersons (band)
 |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using
|
Band does not meet notability requirements in WP:MUSIC. Prod tag was contested. OhNoitsJamieTalk 01:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I believe this band meets the Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability requirement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by W9843 (talk • contribs).
- Keep. Vanity perhaps, but it seems that this band has made considerable contribution to the community and that a good deal of people (other than the community) would be able to recognize them on a search.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by W9843 (talk • contribs).
I agree with the above commentator. I live in New York, and I have heard of this band before. They are well worthy of a wikipeida page.—This unsigned comment was added by User3344 (talk • contribs) .
This may be true but this may be their attempt to write a first article and may publish several others after this. But as we continue to debate its deletion, their confidence to write an article is slowly decreasing.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.151.39.31 (talk • contribs).
- Keep. They have "become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city". —This unsigned comment was added by 146.151.39.31 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete nn. --Khoikhoi 03:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 03:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as not important enough to include in an encyclopedia. Brian G. Crawford, the so-called "Nancy Grace of AfD" 04:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - poorly written article about non-notable music group. dbtfztalk 04:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet WP:MUSIC. To those voting keep, please read WP:MUSIC and if possible, explain to us how it meets the requirements there. JoshuaZ 05:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Arbusto 06:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Clear delete per nom. Joe 06:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester
Ready Aim Fire! 07:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC) - Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC,WP:VAIN.--Dakota ~ ° 08:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete, as per nomination. --Soumyasch 08:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity band. --Terence Ong 09:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, VanityBandCruft. Deizio 17:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Jay(Reply) 22:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 00:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
