Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search Toppers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Search Toppers
Fails WP:CORP. No Google hits except its own home page. IceCreamAntisocial 06:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:CORP and even WP:SOFTWARE. --Daniel Olsen 06:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Useless article. Clay4president 06:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Gwernol 06:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Searchtoppers has developed a way for non 3G phones to recieve streaming HD video, no other company can do this, period. This means we can bridge the 3 year gap between the inferior us networks and counties like japan in a matter of months not years. that is why I wrote the article on searchtoppers and that is why they are note worthy. I think it would be a mistake to remove.
- If someone can verify that, I would certainly agree. - Mgm|(talk) 09:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- The problem is this is a claim about the impact their technology will have in the future, not a claim about its actual impact now. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until their technology has a recognized impact, it shouldn't be covered in an article. Gwernol 09:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Assuming [1] is the website for the company, I can't find anything regarding the new method for compressing and sending HD video to cell phones. In fact, nothing about the web site even infers that they have expertise in anything but advancing a web page rank in the popular search engines. At the very least these claims are unverifable, at the most, they're an outright WP:HOAX. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 03:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete seems like a promotion and therefore not appropriate for Wikipedia. Cedars 10:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
''PLEASE READ'': for those of you who are doubters, please notice no back link to the website wich would be the case if one was self promotion, and further more if you have a phone with a web brouser go to searchtoppers.tv and view a demo of the search toppers mobile streaming technology in action. the mobile streaming transfer rate is greater than 24 frames per second (HD). It works on all carriers except verizon who has not lowered their "wall garden". search and lear about carrier wall gardens then you can look up H.264 technology without disclosing patent pending information you can easily see searctoppers is who they claim to be. Thank you in advance for the time it will take you to confirm. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dhurowitz (talk • contribs).
- The problem appears to be verification. We need a source that has written about this technology. Trying using a mobile phone would be original research. Besides, not everyone lives whereever this service is available. - Mgm|(talk) 07:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
