From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Search_Toppers 2 you missed one 3 Parks 3.1 Jackson Hole, Wyoming

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Search_Toppers

You might want to reconsider your vote or change your reasoning. It turns out the site you thought belonged to the company isn't the correct one. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Oops - got to it too late. Thanks for the heads up. I still don't think it would have mattered - there are several billion companies that feel they're going to have the next great breakthrough with H.264, so why should this team be any different? - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 06:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] you missed one

see also Otupa Flow. — coelacan talk — 04:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Probably best to make a separate nom. People are more comfortable voting delete in separate AFDs. Bundle them and people start to wonder if they should really be bundled and not considered on their own separate merits. On Wikipedia, in my experience, you can sink more boats with precise targetting. — coelacan talk — 05:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, WP:DRV process hounds (such as myself) usually have an easier time overturning bundled nominations, although this is not universally true. — coelacan talk — 05:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

If you want, I'll unbundle them and make the separate nom, since you've already done quite a bit. — coelacan talk — 05:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Done! Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otupa Flow. — coelacan talk — 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Parks

I have been going over the pages for the national parks recently and have discovered that 2 different sources are being reported for visitation statistics. In some cases, the 'recreational visitors' total is shown, while in others it is the 'total visitors.' Obviously, this needs to be standardized one way or another, and I chose the 'total' number, but using the other would be fine as well. Either way, though, it would be for the best for one number or the other to be used consistantly, and it should be labeled accordingly. Agree? Mr. Vitale 04:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, CosmicPenguin. You and I seem to be having similar conversations with VitaleBaby. Maybe we can find a more public place to have this discussion... --orlady 04:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jackson Hole, Wyoming

I removed your edit to Jackson Hole, Wyoming - Harrison Ford is already mentioned in Jackson, Wyoming, and thats a better location for that sort of trivia. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 00:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

If you look at Ford's page, it lists him as a resident of Jackson Hole, not Jackson. So why would Jackson be a better place for this? --Schmendrick 18:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)