Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensation (event)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Proto::► 11:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sensation (event), Sensation White, Sensation Black
- Sensation (event) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sensation White (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sensation Black (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Bump from speedy. Neutral. If kept, recommend merging the three. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-18 08:23Z
- Delete I cannot find any non-trivial mentions in reliable sources for this one. JChap2007 02:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Article as written is spam WVhybrid 06:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 06:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. This article should be kept as this is clearly a major event in Europe and especially in the Netherlands where seats for Sensation white (40 000) usualy solds out in hours. If the article seems too close to spam, maybe a NPOV would be more appropriate than deletion, as this event would surely reappear on the encyclopedia. Sensation has detractors and some factual informations about this can be found to correct the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.224.48.80 (talk • contribs).
- Keep Sensation (event), merge the other two into it. Although currently lacking secondary sources, it does appear to be real and notable. --- RockMFR 05:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.