Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstate New York Cosplay Society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 06:16Z
[edit] Upstate New York Cosplay Society
- Upstate New York Cosplay Society (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)</noinclude
- Image:UNYCSLogo.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)
- Image:OnriginalUNYCS.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)
Appears to fail WP:CORP. Prod tag was removed without explanation. Article is unreferenced. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 02:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete non-notable club, might even meet the criteria of {{db-spam}} or {{db-group}}. Wooyi 02:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Josh Parris
- Delete per Wooyi. Edeans 03:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per g11. Krimpet 14:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep if notability can be established. Nardman1 15:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Well, naturally keep if notability can be established; but that's exactly what we're tying to determine in this discussion: is the article notable? -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 16:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I have worked hevily to include all possible references retaining to this article. Images have been fixed and the content has been edited to common Wikipedia standards in effort to keep the article up. Fireicefalcon 16:46 9 Feb 2007/ Talk
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- Farix (Talk) 14:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough reliable third-party sources given to establish notability. Google search comes up with 8 hits, none of which are reliable sources. And finally, most of the article is unverifiable outside of primary sources. --Farix (Talk) 14:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. Let me also add in WP:COI issues considering this edit to a user's talk page.[1]
- Comment I am Sorry That I am unable to retrive all the information. Archives that use to show notablility no longer have the article. If conflict of interest is a problem, I assure you that my position in this should not be a confliction with the article. --[User:Fireicefalcon|Fireicefalcon] 11:03a 7 February (EST) P.s The talk page was simply asking what was wrong and what could be fixed to make the article a quality addition to Wikipedia.
- Comment I have found notability and will list them here if I may.
1) the Genericon convention book
2)anime gamers alliance's calendar in google's cache-
Google Cache
Genericon Conbook (Page 6, lefthand side, second from the bottom
Currently the Times union article has been taken down while they repair the archives --Fireicefalcon 02:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)"I bless you in the name of the Yaoi, Yuri, and Bishonen"
- Comment TimesUnion has reposted the article. fujisawa 11:35am, 2/9/07 (EST)
- Comment One independent article is not sufficient to pass the primary notability criteria, much less any of the other criteria in WP:ORG. --Farix (Talk) 15:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.