Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaohushua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sacred Name Movement. Sandstein 07:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yaohushua
Original Research or Unverifiable Dachannien 20:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --SonicChao talk 20:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect
to Judaism...though it smells of hoax. Canadian-Bacon t c 21:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Redirect to Jewish_Messiah provided it isn't a hoax Canadian-Bacon t c 21:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to
Jewish MessiahSacred Name Movement or Yeshua, per Metropolitician. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 21:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC) - Redirect to either Sacred Name Movement or Yeshua or otherwise delete. "Yaohushua" is not a possible transliteration of the Hebrew word for "messiah" (which would be something like "moshiach") but does resemble the transliteration of Yeshua which is often cited as the Hebrew name of Jesus. The discussion at Talk:Yaohushua implies that the name "Yaohushua" is being promulgated by a group which espouses that name as being the proper name for Jesus, which would be an example of the Sacred Name Movement. --Metropolitan90 22:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks to Patstuart and Metropolitan90 for the insight. After reading the Sacred Name Movement page, I agree that this would be an appropriate destination for a redirect. --DachannienTalkContrib 22:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.