Talk:Blood electrification
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eh, if the user would like to know about this topic, could someone shout it into his talk page? I personally have no clue, but it's only cluttering up the Wiki. -- Master of Puppets(MASTER! MASTER!) 14:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] AfD result
[edit] The information below
I'm not sure if 172.212.187.167 and 131.107.0.73 are the same person, or even if either is a static IP... Wikipedia has a no original research policy, so the information below can't be in the article, because it is not verified. --CDN99 03:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm new to Wikipedia, and I wrote the below, based on 4 years experience with the devices, and founder of the group microelectricitygermkiller. I'm not sure what to do, can someone advise me how to "verify" or whatever the doubt is about the information? thnx, Bob ps, I just modified it to exclude anything I cannot verify. This only names the study, where to find it, and where the group researching it is.
Here is additional data:
Drs. Kaali, Schwolsky, Lyman and Merkatz at Einstein College of Medicine in NYC around 1990, did an experiment in vitro (test tube) that showed dramatic reductions in HIV infectivity, while proving that the amount of electricity used was safe (in fact cells treated with it lived longer than untreated cells). Their paper, see link below, showed a 99.3% reduction in infectivity compared to the same cells exposed to non-treated HIV. The treatment was for various times and levels of current, up to 7.7 microamps (millionths of an amp) per sq mm surface area of electrodes in contact with the virus, and up to 6 minutes. Their maximum current would be barely felt to a human. But apparently the virus responded by becoming almost completely inactivated, permanently, in a period of about 3 minutes.
A writeup of it can be found here: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/ in the "files" section. It is necessary per Yahoo rules to join the group at least temporarily to see the group files.
This link is a grass-roots research interest group which is testing a simpler device than Beck's (just a battery and length of wire) to ascertain the workability of the concept on various virus, bacteria, fungi, in vivo (in a living body). No claims are made here about the outcomes.
Individuals belonging to the yahoo group report voluntarily about their condition and results, good or bad. Files are kept showing the results. There are no commerical activities, and there is no funding for this volunteer effort.
That's self-reported anecdote/testimonial, it's not the same as an objective, peer-reviewed, scientific study. Have there been any peer-reviewed studies for this?Merkinsmum 16:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pubmed
That's a proper source, isn't it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merkinsmum (talk • contribs) 16:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC).
