User talk:Britney901
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Stephen Molaro
A tag has been placed on Stephen Molaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 04:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Anne Hathaway (actress). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 02:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Regina, Saskatchewan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 02:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Enyne, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Elephant
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The New Groove Orchestra
A tag has been placed on The new groove orchestra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Goodnightmush 03:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
I'm utterly uninterested in how awesome steve is [1] - please stop vandalising wikipedia and start helping to improve it. You're just going to get blocked otherwise. Cheers. --Mcginnly | Natter 17:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Joe_rogan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Joe_rogan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Angel_som.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Angel_som.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Root.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Root.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Molaro
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mark Molaro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. feydey 16:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Anne_Hathaway_007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_Hathaway_007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Anne_hathaway_02.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_hathaway_02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Images on Anne Hathaway
Wikipedia wants images that are freely available to anybody, whereas most publicity photos are still owned by somebody who wants to retain control. Of course Wikipedia makes exceptions where there is no free alternative available (somebody's dead, for example, or to depict a character rather than an actor), but in the case of a living celebrity that's not a realistic argument - theoretically, you could attend a film festival or award ceremony and take a pic. See Brad Pitt for an example. (Quentin X 20:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stevie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stevie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stevie_carell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stevie_carell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
