Cafeteria Christianity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cca7/6cca7de6a80757def7749a5ff11ba7eb9cc180bf" alt="Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant (see Hebrews 8:6). His famous sermon from a hill representing Mount Zion is considered by many Christian scholars to be the antitype of the proclamation of the Old Covenant by Moses from Mount Sinai."
Cafeteria Christianity is a pejorative term, used in general to describe individual Christians or Christian churches who selectively follow or believe in the doctrines of their religion, particularly what the Bible states as being the word or will of God. The use of the term suggests that the believers being so described are not as legitimate as other Christians. As cafeteria style means to pick and choose, as in choosing what food to purchase from a cafeteria line, the implication of the term "Cafeteria Christianity" is that the individual's professed religious belief is actually a proxy for their personal opinions rather than a genuine interpretation of or spiritual relationship with Christian doctrine or the teachings of Jesus. The selectivity implied may relate to the acceptance of Christian doctrines (such as creationism and the virgin birth of Jesus) or Biblical morality and ethical prohibitions (e.g. a rejection of homosexual acts and dietary laws) and is often associated with discussions concerning the applicability of Old Testament laws to Christians and the Sermon on the Mount.
The label "Cafeteria Christianity" has been used both to encourage more conformity with Biblical teachings and to advocate for less. When used by Conservative Christians, it is often an expression of a preference for a more literal and uniform approach to the Bible, rather than the carefree do-what-you-want theology preferred (as some see it) by Liberal Christians. The term in this sense thus expresses contempt for those viewed as lax in their Christianity.
It is also used by some Christians and skeptics to undermine the advocacy of particular Christian precepts by pointing out the supposed inconsistency of the advocate's position. The logic of such a usage is that someone who has rejected one supposed command of God has little room to argue that another such command should be followed. Thus these individuals observe that some Christians are more than willing to condemn certain behavior on Biblical grounds and yet do not themselves adhere to the Bible in its totality, i.e. a charge of hypocrisy.
[edit] References
- ^ See also Antithesis of the Law.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Hang Six - A biblically correct solution to the Ten Commandments controversy
- Moralistic Therapeutic Deism - the New American Religion
- COG article on Cafeteria Christianity
- Pastor Russ Reese on Cafeteria Christianity
- An Atheist argument on Cafeteria Christianity
- Cafeteria Catholics
- Madison Catholic Herald: Cafeteria Christians
- St. Luke Orthodox Church: Sodomy
- Pope Benedict decries �cafeteria Catholicism�
- U.S. Catholic Magazine: Cafeteria Catholics