User talk:CamelCommodore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PLEASE LEAVE MESSAGES HERE FOR CAMEL COMMODORE
Contents |
[edit] Hello from Camel Commodore!
Camel Commodore greets you. You seem to know a lot about Star Trek and Camel Commodore would like to help. Let Camel Commodore know what he can do to help, and with which articles. Let's all call everyone to "Wikipedia Battlestations!" if you know what Camel Commodore means. -CamelCommodore 12:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yo,
- You can talk in first person. :)
- Starfleet alternate ranks and insignia needs a lot of work. Feel free to contribute. :)
- --Cat out 12:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Camel Commodore must talk in Camel code so that others do not discover Camel Commodore, if you know what Camel Commodore means. Camel Commodore must hide underneath the sands and avoid being seen, les the Taliban catch Camel Commodore and eat him for breakfest! -CamelCommodore 13:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thinly veiled Husnock?
I do not expect you to admit being a sockpuppet. I would be most appreciative if you simply didn't respond to this; denying it does not serve any purpose. Agreeing to it only hurts you. Just please read this, take it in the helpful spirit it is intended, and move on.
Husnock, using this account as a sockpuppet to evade a block of User:Husnock is not going to help you in any respect. The veil here is thin; most of us who have had interactions with you know that you are deployed in the gulf, thus "camel" and that you are in the navy, thus "commodore". That's enough reason to suspect. But, to go from account creation to third edit adding "keep" to an AfD of a fairly obscure article shows this account to be a sockpuppet of someone, the only question being who. Plus the fact that you acknowledge being undercover to Coolcat [1]. Also, given also that you immediately proclaimed friendship with CoolCat on your first day and show an affinity for the same sorts of articles that you as Husnock edited shows a strong connection. This is not an accusation, but simply showing you the reasons these conclusions are being drawn by myself and others.
Attempting to avoid a block via the use of a sockpuppet makes your case considerably weaker. The matter regarding the compromising of User:Husnock is apparently being reviewed by ArbCom. Stewards have already made a decision not to desysop User:Husnock because no admin abuses occurred from that account since it was compromised (Husnock has been de-adminned). By attempting to evade a block, you make it considerably more likely that a block will endure on User:Husnock. The better, higher road is to take your lumps, admit error and apologize, and plea for a reduction of the block.
Please, stop this pattern of self destructive behavior and get back on the track of conducting good edits as you have in the past. This drama is entirely avoidable, but only if you decide to avoid it. The choice is yours.
Please be aware that a formal RfAr has been requested and posted to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. Don't make this worse for yourself by sockpuppeting. Go back to Husnock and request an unblock so you can contribute to the RfAr, restricting your edits only to the RfAr.
With all helpful intent, --Durin 16:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hello whoever you are. I really dont know anything about this, although clicking on one of the buttons on the left hand side of this screen I see this account is now linked to some discussion pages about the person you speak of. I just started this account today and was introduced to it by a couple of people who already had accounts. I saw someone did an ip address trace on me and posted where I live. I don't want to be involved in this, I just came over to start up a webpage and have a good time. Best- Camel Commo.
Please stop this Husnock - this puppet show is both obvious and sad to watch. --Charlesknight 19:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tell me who you are right now
I'm about to get kicked off this site. Tell me who you are right now. -Husnock 19:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I was only trying to help. They are being mean to you, don't take it. -CamelCommodore 19:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Whoever the hell you are, stay out of this. I am already up on numerous charges and what you just did seems to confirm that I have a sockpuppet. Stay out of this, please. -Husnock 19:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Camel, please do not act disruptively, things are bad enough, and disruption is not nice. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 20:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
Blocked: I have reviewed your contributions and you appear to be a single-purpose account for the purpose of making trolling edits targeted against User:Husnock or in matters than concern him. So I have blocked your account indefinitely. You may ask to have this block reviewed by posting {{Unblock}} and giving a reason. Thatcher131 21:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Also note Dmcdevit has identified you as using the same IP address as User:Husnock [2]. I take no stand on this, other than to note it for any admins who might review this block. Thatcher131 21:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trying to fix this
I am trying to get you released from the block. If you are, for God's sake stay away from me and these disputes I've been involved in. I would recommend going cold for a month just to let this all pass. People think you're me and it will be hard to convince them otherwise after what you did. Thanks. -Husnock 15:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I did all I could for you. Way too many people on this site are getting way too interested in exactly who we are and where we live. There's also too many folks still suggested we are somehoe connected and/or the same person (with the amount of money you make, I wish I was you!) I think the best thing to do would be to establish a new account, maybe changing the layout and style so it doesnt get re-blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned account. You have my e-mail, send any further questions my way. Thanks also for the pictures of the "tallest building in the world". That was pretty neat. -Husnock 03:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)