User talk:Claire marsh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I am not a sockpuppet of anyone, and it was wrong to block 195.188.50.200 (talk • contribs), which is a shared IP. It is shared!"
Decline reason: "Nope checkusers can see every edit from an IP, and that IP has been used exclusively for vandalism"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.Creation of accounts such as User:JAKE REMINGTON IS BETTER THAN THE M62 MANCHESTER and User:Jake Remington fucked Linuxbeak and JoanneB! --pgk(talk) 18:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I did not create those accounts, it is most likely kids, the IP is a shared one, and I apologise for people using it. You do realise you are blocking public terminals from access?? If you have any questions email me - I will have email enabled soon! NOTE: TheM62Manchester (talk • contribs) is a legitimate user who I know in real life"
Decline reason: "Yes we got that when you magically turn up, interesting that by pure coincidence your IP has been used to create usernames including him, pure coincidence that every other edit from that IP as verified by checkuser has been vandalism, coincidence that those previously using that IP address who have requested unblocks as collateral damage have subsequently been blocked for page move vandalism. No."
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I did not create those accounts, it is most likely kids, the IP is a shared one, and I apologise for people using it. You do realise you are blocking public terminals from access?? If you have any questions email me - I will have email enabled soon! NOTE: User:TheM62Manchester is a legitimate user who I know in real life"
Decline reason: "This request has been reviewed and denied. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.