User talk:David D.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
You may
 here |
|||||||||||||||||
[edit] Semi-automated taxonomic list generation OK?
Hi David,
Daisy woke up this morning in good voice and produced a List of Archaea genera. Is that what you had in mind, maybe, kind of? Any suggestions would be most welcome! :) Willow 17:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hey that looks pretty good. You may want to break the list up a bit, maybe into phylum? It would be nice to add some other facts too; hey don't look at me! Nice thing about lists is that they accomodate red links too. Sorry to hear you're branded witht he L word at work :( David D. (Talk) 19:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Any idea why there is only one class of Crenarchaeota? Are the classifications to order, rather than class, based on phylogenetic distances? In that phylum it would seem more appropriate to assume the mutation rate is a bit slower rather than most of the diversity has been lost. David D. (Talk) 19:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thanks for your friendly welcome which is one of only two friendly messages I have recieved so far (apart from the initial one by Someone called friday). Im not an expert on anything really, but I do like to see things presented neatly and clearly so I will try to help where I can--SlipperyHippo 18:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi SlipperyHippo (is Slippo a good contraction? ;) ), I actually like the shorter leads so it looks good to me . I guess Friday likes them a bit longer. Glad to be able to welcome a new comer. Hope you have a good experience here. David D. (Talk) 18:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I think 'Slippery' might be nicer! Thanks again.--SlipperyHippo 18:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Slippery it is. David D. (Talk) 18:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think 'Slippery' might be nicer! Thanks again.--SlipperyHippo 18:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You seem to be a very friendly person. Do you mind me asking if you are British or American?--SlipperyHippo 21:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Born UK live US. A hybrid? David D. (Talk) 21:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to be a very friendly person. Do you mind me asking if you are British or American?--SlipperyHippo 21:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Ah I thought I got a sense of the Brit in you. Im from UK and still here.--SlipperyHippo 22:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Hi David
Hi there, if you've got the time I'd be grateful for any comments and suggestions you might have in the peer-review of metabolism. The page is Wikipedia:Peer review/Metabolism. Thanks! TimVickers 00:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another FAC
Hi David,
It never rains, but it pours? ;)
Encyclopædia Britannica is also at FAC, just above Metabolism. If you're looking at the latter, could you maybe throw a glance at the former? I hope that you can support it, but any thoughts or comments would be most welcome. Thanks very much! Willow 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Willow is, as usual, ahead of me. TimVickers 23:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Above, but not ahead; Metabolism just got made into an Featured Article! :D
-
- Poor Encyclopædia Britannica is still getting herself spruced up, while everyone else is going to the party. :( Any help or suggestions you could give would be great - thanks, David! Willow 23:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal
The above-entitled arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published at the above link. Ilena (talk • contribs) is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year and is banned from editing articles and talk pages related to alternative medicine, except talk pages related to breat implants. Fyslee (talk • contribs) is cautioned to use reliable sources and to edit from a neutral point of view. He is reminded that editors with a known partisan point of view should be careful to seek consensus on the talk page of articles to avoid the appearance of a COI if other editors question their edits. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
