Talk:Dom Passantino
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To be honest, I think the time has come to delete this entry. Its subject inspires such controversy that it will never be possible to achieve consensus or prevent vandalism (unless of course it is semi-protected at the very least): obviously some entries have to remain whatever vandalism takes place because their subject is too important, but this is hardly the case with this person, whose encyclopaedic criteria seem insignificant and who is basically here for a few people to continually vandalise the entry and display their tedious, hateful feuds. I can think of more significant people from the same "clique" as DP who aren't here. Entries like this simply bring Wikipedia down, and the best thing to do is to remove them.
Semi protection has to be the way forward then, surely?
do we really need this article? Surely it's a waste of the mods time to keep coming back and re-editing a piece on an unknown journalist? I checked out the links as per the non-notability criteria and all he seems to be is a more formal version of the kid in the back of grade school who'd say things to wind up everyone else. I doubt he'll ever have any kind of wider impact outside the particular limp biscuit society that keep returning to this page.