From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drat.
|
|
Drat
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a48/10a48b71cb145598f9965239e06009b826d0ae26" alt="" |
This user's time zone is GMT+10. |
G |
This user uses Google as a primary search engine. |
8000+ |
This user has over 8000 edits |
vanity |
This user supports the removal of Vanity pages with extreme prejudice. |
linkspam |
This user despises linkspam, and will terminate it on sight, as well as any other spam by the contributor. |
|
[edit] Subpages
- User:Drat/Images - Images I have uploaded.
- User:Drat/Image resizing - Help reduce unnecessary white space in infoboxes that contain images.
- User:Drat/Listen to the article - You'd be surprised how easily a speech synthesizer can help you pick up article errors. Not to be confused with making voice recordings of articles.
- User:Drat/Userboxes - Userboxes I make. At the moment, just new ones. Later I guess the old ones will have to got here per WP:GUS.
[edit] About me
Well, I'm 25 years old, male, and I like computer games. I'm from Gosford, Australia.
You can check my personal site here. A lot of the content on there is pretty old though.
I particularly like Doom, Doom II, System Shock, System Shock 2, Quake, Quake II, Thief, Thief II Deus Ex, Half-Life, NetHack and the Flight Unlimited series, etc. If I ever get a chance to play Half-Life 2, I guess I will like that too. Graphics have no real effect on me, and I almost never use graphical enhancement mods for games. Gameplay is everything.
I like video game music and remixes centred on my favourite games.
I have an interest in Linux, but need to get around to putting it back on my computer.
I registered on Wikipedia under the name DooMDrat in late November, 2004. Almost exactly a year later, I had my username changed to Drat. I would have gone with Drat in the first place, but I could have sworn it was taken at the time. Must've been my imagination. The name Drat came from an assumed (and incorrect) spelling of a character's name from the kid's show The Trap Door, which I liked as a kid (and still like).
I AFD the odd article I find to be severely non-notable. If you can only realistically write two lines about something, its not really worth dedicating a seperate page to it. Of course, once an article starts to get quite large (eg. Red vs Blue), it can be a good idea to split up some sections. Take for example RvB episode guides and the character pages.
I'm also somewhat of a mergist. I feel that one large article is better than several crappy little ones. It's easier to edit one article than it is to edit eight. That's part of the reason I merged all the of the Doom enemies into one article.
I've also got this real big thing about optimising image filesizes. In fact, most of my image uploads are files I've done some sort of optimisation on. I may write a section with some image optimising tips.
[edit] Some guidelines for editors
Some of this is pretty obvious, but there are some things people don't think of.
[edit] Check your edits
The preview button is there for a reason. Use it. Be sure to check any wikilinks and external links you create or modify, that you are unsure of. This will help eliminate unintentional redlinks and redirects, and bad external links. It can also cut down on having to do multiple edits to make the same amount of changes. This makes things easier for people doing version comparisons.
[edit] Should you make a new page for something related to a bigger topic?
For example, an item or enemy in a game.
Weigh up the following:
- How big (filesize) and/or long (vertically) is the main article? Can you write about the "thing" there without making the article too big or long?
- How much can realistically be written about the "thing"? I don't mean necessarily right now, but where do you see the article in six months? If you can only really write two sentences without waffling, is it really worth putting it in a separate article?
- Is it important enough to the topic to justify a separate article? Also, is it important enough to other topics? A topic related to more than one subject may warrant a page more than a topic related to just one subject.
- How many other of these "things" are there? Maybe you could make an article covering all the items or enemies. One big article is better and takes less time to read and edit than twenty little ones.
[edit] Dealing with vandals
When you spot vandalism, revert or fix it. Be sure to warn the user. Check the vandal's contributions for other vandalism, and revert/fix them if needed. If there are lots of contributions, you don't need to check them all, just recent ones. If it is an IP user, edits made a few weeks ago or earlier are much less likely to be the same person, and any really old vandalism has likely been spotted and fixed (not always the case, of course). If you have to revert multiple instances of vandalism, only warn the user again for vandalism they cause after you previously warned them.
[edit] Pages I have started:
[edit] Templates
[edit] Adapted from others
[edit] Self-made
[edit] Pages that need work
Still essentially stubs, or not far past stubs.
[edit] Better pages
I (and/or others) have worked on these more, and the articles are much better for it. That said, like with any article, if you think you can improve them, go ahead. That's what Wikipedia is all about!
[edit] Significant contributions to other articles
[edit] To do:
I'll get around to these eventually, but I'm really lazy.
- Make article on the engine used in the games Ultima Underworld I & II and System Shock. The alien technology that things' got running under the hood...
- Tyrian (game) article needs work.
- Augmentation system section for Deus Ex article?
[edit] Pet hates:
- Religious extremists, particularly right-wing christians, most particularly Fred Phelps.
- People who make new topics on message boards to ask questions that already have been asked and answered 3+ times on the main page alone. I mean, not searching is bad enough, but use your bloody eyes for crying out aloud!
- People who judge old games purely by comparing their graphics with today's games. Same goes for movies.
- Compaq and Hewlett-Packard. Crappy, shitty, cheap, faulty bundle systems.
- A lot of modern popular music. Mainly modern rap/hip-hop where the singers never stop talking, brain-dead pop and no-talent techno (especially the "DOOF-DOOF-DOOF-DOOF-DOOF" variety).
- Gimmicky, ultra-flashy program interfaces and web sites, especially when they get in the way of efficient use.
- Anime. I really frigging hate it. I consider it a curse and a disease. And I can't stand the fans, the extremist ones, that is. In other words, the stupid, ultra-obsessive ones, especially the ones who never shut up about it, or use those creepy emoticons. Get a life, you dorks. Just because it comes from Japan doesn't mean it has to be worshipped.
- cartoon pornography. Anyone involved in its creation must be locked up. Or better yet, killed. Slowly. In public. Same goes for people who watch said vomit.
- Idiotic marketing execs. You know, the kind who come up with stupid, intelligence insulting slogans, advertisements and product names. 56K E-Modem, anyone? And can those Lynx commercials get any more blatantly sexist?
- Companies like Electronic Arts. Their lust for profit is driving companies, workers, and gaming franchises into the ground. Good thing they never got all the rights to System Shock 1 and 2.
[edit] Extra-special pet hates:
I'm a pacifist, but there are people who must die (violently, if need be), for the good of humanity.
- Anyone involved in the sexual abuse of children, or who makes material that involves or promotes such practices. That includes cartoon material (and I don't give a flying fuck whether its legal in your country). Anyone who makes or is into such material must be hunted down, arrested, given a fair trial, and executed if found guilty. If you think I sound a little extreme, ask yourself this: If you knew that someone was into that sort of shit, even if they had never done anything to a child, would you trust them around children? Somehow, I doubt you will.