Talk:Sidux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Advert problems
Can someone please specify what part of the article can be misunderstood as advertisement and what kind of sources should be referenced else? And can someone please explain why it is not wanted to explain something about the future of a distribution? --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.171.59.167 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 27 January 2007.
- Sidux isn't future software. It's run on my system !!! --Qaridarium 15:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- The advertising parts have improved, but there are a few traces remaining, like "comfortable" and "easily". For the sources, we can't tell you where to take them. People that add information need to add their sources.--Chealer 18:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- "easily" and "comfortable" are removed - I think the label "advertisment" can be removed now? And sources are cited too (distrowatch.com, techpatterns.com, sidux-wiki). JaKi143 16:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Hey ip! The netinstall is not option any longer and there is some more that is not right!
-
and Qaridarium, as this is only a preview-release at the moment, it is future software, if you read the tag right, it says, it might contain future software, so it's possible, that the content will change! So after the release is out, there will be changes to the content of this article! - tania --84.135.205.100 19:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Can you please specify which parts are not right? Alternatively: change'em :) JaKi143 16:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Hey Guys! Do You know at least the basic principle of Debian-Sid? There will be never ever a FINAL! This is in its nature. So Sidux cant be even final, but it exists! Do you know THE Final Human?! He doesnt exist and will never - in the end he dies! Will be WP even be Final?! NO! So dont be foolish, or is WP based on Vista? Maybeeeee... --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.82.255.252 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 1 February 2007.
[edit] Cleanup
I was asked on my talk page why this article is tagged cleanup. Checking the article, I realized that "Linux" appears in complete lowercase in the first sentence. I hope that answers the question.--Chealer 03:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not my area of expertise, but I went through the article to clean up the language. It had a definate non-english speaker flavor to it. It should be better now, though it double checking my work would be a good idea. --Lendorien 20:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
