Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Coyote portrait
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Coyote portrait
Given that we seem to be back to doing dogs...
From Commons, uploaded by Ed; originally from [1]; the licence [2] is cc-by-2.0; illustrates Coyote nicely.
- Nominate and support. - James F. (talk) 03:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Beautiful detail. ed g2s • talk 04:04, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Stunning. Autiger 03:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Great detail and shot. I wonder if it cropping a little of right would make it even better? Janderk 09:10, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- I wouldn't crop, since the picture as it now stands centers (or nearly so) on the eye of the coyote, and I like it that way. :-) But I leave it to wiser photographical minds than mine to make the final decision. Jwrosenzweig 21:21, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 22:09, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Would be featured picture material if the ears hadn't been cut off. I must oppose. Denni☯ 00:28, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
- Support. I have new wallpaper. Mark1 02:02, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support.--Eloquence* 02:09, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Brilliant shot. Very detailed and well focused. --Fir0002 04:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Enochlau 15:07, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Poor photography. --[[User:Brian0918|brian0918 talk]] 19:37, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Just out of interest, why do you think so? Enochlau 19:19, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
SupportOppose, I need to be consistent with my concern about just including the head of an animal as a featured picture. - Bevo 23:29, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Oppose, regretfully, due to ear being cut off. -- Chris 73 Talk 23:59, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose - need that eartop. - Trick 18:16, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Don't care that much about the ear. Truly stunning shot. Look at the full-sized version, seriously. grendel|khan 05:51, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
- Oppose Darkone 17:35, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support - it would probably be better with the tips of the ears and the harsh change in background tone is a little distracting, but the intent look and square on profile make up for it. -- Solipsist 23:51, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -Lommer | talk 08:59, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Promoted, +13 / -6 - Solipsist 18:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
