Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plasma lamp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Plasma lamp
Image:Plasma Lamp.jpg
Edited and improved version
I searched for Plasma, and this was at the top of the article. Immediately striking, and well taken. Very slightly unfocused, but if I get the time to do a slightly lower resolution version that could be fixed. The colour is amazing. I already nominated M4 Carbine Casing which was a success, so I thought this might be recognized as well. Let it be known that I did not take or upload this. I am just nominating it because I saw it on the article and thought it was worthy. There are also two other Featured Pictures currently in the article, the Voyager Heliosheath diagram and the Energy Arc.
- Nominate and
Support. - —Vanderdecken∫ξφ 12:52, 24 November 2005 (UTC) - Support A great image, good background. -Falcorian 04:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Sweet shot, amigo. A rare find indeed. TomStar81 09:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- ( + ) Support It's not particularly sharp, but I don't think that can be fixed on this photo unless you reshoot. Good background and colors, plus I really like plasma balls. --Fir0002 08:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- ( + ) Support - Support for sure. Every bit as good as mine, even better in some ways. A worthy FP.PiccoloNamek 08:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- I think you accidently removed my vote when you copied my support template for your vote Piccolo. Never mind, fixed now. --Fir0002 10:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support, quite spectacular. I'm not sure how sharp this sort of shot can be, but it looks fine to me. Raven4x4x 23:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Very beautiful image. Carioca 04:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Really no need for more support, is there? --Janke | Talk 13:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Not as pretty as current featured picture Image:Photos-photos 1087592507 Energy Arc.jpg, but more illustrative. —Cryptic (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- ( + ) Support. --Lysy (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- New version, removed all artefacts in the background (of which there were quite a few) and adjusted colours slightly. The file size is smaller too. —Vanderdecken∫ξφ 20:05, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support either one. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 03:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support any of the two --Roger McLassus 09:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support both Kessa Ligerro 10:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support either. It's going on my desktop as wallpaper now. Enochlau 15:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support and comment. I had been meaning to add this[1]] to wikipedia for quite a while now and this featured picture has reminded me. I definitely agree that this one is a higher quality image, but I like the illustration in my photo of exactly how the plasma is 'attracted' to a conducting object. Diliff 01:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Plasma-lamp_2.jpg Raven4x4x 03:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
![[1]](http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Plasma_lamp_touching.jpg){kind=link}