Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/peacock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Peacock Head
This picture was created by Moshe Ash and is featured in the article Peacock. It is a fine example of a peacock head and is a good illustration of the great images displayed on Wikipedia.
The guy who created it has a big ego, though.
- Nominate and support. - MosheA 15:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support It's definetly high quality and displays several features of the peacock very well, but the crop job on it (whether in lens or in Photoshop) means it fails to display a whole lot of the Peacock. Staxringold 19:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - this one is not bad but photos of peacocks can be so much more striking. For instance, the Image:040411.JPG from the same article is better. -- P199 21:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. It could be bigger, however if that's not possible than it doesn't really matter. I don't know why, but this image isn't very striking (something about the angle I think). --Pharaoh Hound 21:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Its a good a quality picture and shows a lot of detail of the head. Spizzma 01:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with P199. Poor background, tail is much better as bg --Fir0002 www 08:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)- Support - tremendous detail on head. Whole bird is not required if the photo details one part. --Golbez 15:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's a nice photo of a peacock head, and picture quality and size are fine. But ultimately I don't think it adds much to the article, which is already a bit of a gallery, including another close-up peacock head as mentioned by P199. Overall oppose on lack of encyclopaedic value. --jjron 15:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Attractive and encyclopedic presentation of subject. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 22:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose There is a much better image on the same article Swollib 08:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted Mikeo 19:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
