User talk:Futurebird
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Useful Tags and Banners
Archive: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Contents |
[edit] something that might be of future help..
Hi Futurebird, I hope everything is going well for you. I just thought I'd drop you a line about the updated policy on reliable sources in WP:ATT. You probably already are aware of it but just in case. It has a very concise secion on why "fringe theories" that claim to be hidden due to "conspiraces" against them are not reliable sources. It would have made life easier a few weeks ago when dealing with certain POV_PUSHers :)--Cailil 16:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your comment
Thanks for noticing the Timeline of Racial Tension in Omaha, Nebraska. Reading over the exhaustive work you've done, it means something that you saw what I did. Along with that, you may be interested in any of the content here, particularly Civil Rights Movement in Omaha, Nebraska. - Freechild 23:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Quick question, now that I took a 2nd look at your edit - I like Category:Urban decay, and I am tempted to place it on several related articles about North Omaha. However, I am a little concerned that using the title "Urban Decay" can be construed as racist or classist. Do you have any similar qualms? How do you justify or rationalize those types of claims? Thought I'd inquire, and thanks for any wisdom in advance... - Freechild 06:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Freedom
Freedom Tunnel ! nice work ! thanks for giving some official recognition to street art ! Tazmaniacs
[edit] Template
It incorporates scores not only from IQATHWON but also from IQ and Global Inequality so the name is misleading.Ultramarine 16:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- See the template talk page.Ultramarine 16:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Look at this...
Look here at who is crying out for help...lol. This user sure has made quite a few enemies in a short time; you should check out their talk page history. --David Shankbone 06:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling Error on User Page?
"A parabolas are conic sections." > "All parabolas are conic sections."? Also, I just thought that I should have a quick dicussion with you about setting up a new article racial mahtematics (which may be more politically tenuous than you would like - but may also be quite necessary). And also revamping anti-racist mathematics to provide it with a better foundation for future work. Also, have a look at the "What is this" section in dicussions where the comments by "S. Ugarte 19:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)" admit the following : "Also, one particular nitpick, this following line in "Criticism" is totally inappropriate. The Criticism section is not the place for responses to criticism; it's the place to list criticism.
However, critics would have to accept that the methods and means needed to freely study and evaluate mathematics and science are usually politically and socially manipulated in favour of certain groups (as, for example, cars are distributed in a discriminatory way, so are scientific resources that are involved with them).
I, if I can be said to be a critic, would not accept that. It's just not relevant to the preceding criticism. These facts are indeed objective facts, and how the resources to study them were (perhaps unfairly) allocated simply is a non sequitur. "
Quite significant in my book.
MrASingh 17:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
