Talk:Garment fetishism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Umbrella article
I've created this new article to house all of the previous clothing fetish articles that were original research or had no attribution to reliable sources. If there were any garment fetish article that did support sources then I've left a blurb here and a link to their main article. The exception is the "leather fetish" blurb which I've linked to the Leather subculture article. I'm hoping to add more sources as I go but I'm going to need help. I figured that with the sources I had combined with bare minimum prectically dicdef paragraphs for unsourced material that this would be okay until some editors more familiar editors can get in here and source this stuff. Of course as sources emerge recreating articles when they get to "Start" class quality would be the best plan. NeoFreak 15:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Seems a good idea, though we should be careful of suggesting that "Garment fetishism" is an accepted/notable term, rather, it's that we're just grouping them here for convenience. Mdwh 16:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Well along that train of thought I'd say "list" of Garment feishes. It still uses the "Garment fetish" title though so I'm not really sure how that would solve the OR-ish nature of the term. I'm starting to think that the title is alright as long as no assertions are made about GF without sources. NeoFreak 20:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Uniform fetishim needs link to milism website
My link to milism (short for military SM) website has not survived the re-organisation. I think its best sited on this page under uniform fetish as the milism site hosts a number of articles about fetsishtic military enactment. Do you want to keep links at the foot of the page or are you happy for a link within each sub category? Proposed link would be
MiliSM - website entirely about gay military re-enactment —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Squaddiejohn (talk • contribs) 10:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Sections to review
I'm looking at the garment types listed. It contains gems such as:
- "Gloves: Glove fetishism is a sexual fetish where an individual is obsessed and fixated by another or oneself wearing gloves on their hands."
- "Socks: Sock fetishism is a sexual fetish relating to socks. Sock fetishists are sexually attracted by wearing socks, partners wearing socks, pictures concerning it, or the object itself."
Unless there is evidence these are not tiny minority, or there is actually notable content to provide about them beyond that they exist, then can we instead just include one sentence, along the lines of "minor garment fetishes concerning socks,[CITE] gloves,[CITE] and jackets,[CITE] also exist. In such cases often the fabric, color, or scent is significant."
FT2 (Talk | email) 16:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. NeoFreak 18:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
