Talk:Glen Waverley, Victoria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Glen Waverley, Victoria is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne. | ||
|
Assessment comments
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
In case anybody is wondering, I removed the section about the "three smaller localities of Glen Waverley" (Syndal, Tally Ho, and Wheelers Hill), because Syndal is technically a locality of Mount Waverley, not Glen Waverley, Wheelers Hill is a suburb, not a locality at all, and Tally Ho is too insignificant to merit a mention, particularly on its own. - Vaelor 06:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Agree, agree, disagree. Glen Waverley isn't that big, Tally Ho seems relevant for this article. If the article were 20 pages long and you were looking to trim, then fair enough. But it's barely a stub - why chop? Stevage 07:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not looking to chop as such, more didn't know how to better phrase "Glen Waverley contains, erm, well at least one smaller locality, namely, Tally Ho!". Seemed an awkward sentence once Syndal and Wheelers Hill were removed from the equasion. If you can come up with an intelligent way to mention Tally Ho in the article, please do - it's only that I couldn't! =) - Vaelor 07:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Don't make life hard for yourself. "There is a business park in Glen Waverley called Tally Ho". It's fairly significant, I don't have a list of companies housed there though. Stevage 22:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not looking to chop as such, more didn't know how to better phrase "Glen Waverley contains, erm, well at least one smaller locality, namely, Tally Ho!". Seemed an awkward sentence once Syndal and Wheelers Hill were removed from the equasion. If you can come up with an intelligent way to mention Tally Ho in the article, please do - it's only that I couldn't! =) - Vaelor 07:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redundant copied content needed twice?
Erm, the section in this article about The Glen is almost quite literally word for word identical to the Centro The Glen article itself. Seems a little redundant to me. Should not one or the other be removed, possibly based on whether or not The Glen is noteworthy enough for its own article (if so, chop the repetition out of this article, and if not, delete the independant The Glen article)...? Thoughts anybody? - Vaelor 08:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
