Talk:Higher Self
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A description of the group putting forward these ideas and its history would be useful to place them in context. --pfh
The NPOV page says:
-
-
- If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts;
- If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;
- If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it's true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not.
-
Surely this page falls into the last category?
I agree and have added a clean up tag - Solar 13:07, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Not only does the content currently there need to be placed in the context of a certain author or movement at the very least, but there are several bodies of thought that use the term differently -- I found this page through a link from the Theosophy page, and several Golden Dawn authors use it. A more comprehensive overview of the term and some similar concepts would be worthwhile. M.C. ArZeCh 11:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Would like to know who first coined the term "Higher Self"? Surely that info should be included in the article.
Yes, I've commented on this before, but it does bear repeating: this article mentions at the top a variety of traditions which have some higher self concept, then proceeds to list "types of higher selves" never discussed in some of those traditions. Either this is someone's personal opinion, or it's from a very specific segment of literature on the subject. --M.C. ArZeCh 19:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Aquarian Perspective
There is new information coming onto the plant which simplifies many past, and can I say, complicated knowledge over spiritual terms. I agree with the comments above, and have added a short definition on the Higher Self, and source, to the main page. Ginajr 04:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quotes?
There are things in Comparisons and Summary that are indented as though they are quotes but don't indicate who they are quoting. RJFJR 17:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
