Welcome to my talk page. Please put new entries at the bottom, and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
I will reply both here and on your talk page. Start a new talk topic.
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LGBT WikiProject newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter!
Issue V - April 3, 2007
|
Monthly Challenge:
- Article News
- Project News
- There is now the beginning of a list of core topics to possibly be included in the Wikipedia 1.0 release. Your suggestions are welcome; there may be many core LGBT topics still missing.
- We have a list of people categorized as LGBT whose articles need to be checked for reliable sourcing. This effort is necessary and urgent, to comply with Wikipedia's policy on living persons. Please take a few moments to source one article; if you've got time, do another.
- SatyrTN identified all the articles that were in subcategories of Category:LGBT but not yet tagged with the project's banner, about 1,400 articles. These have been completed, though SatyrBot will make periodic runs through the cats to find any new entries. Thanks Satyr!
- The number of articles within our project's spectrum (6,667 currently) should now be relatively stable and only grow with article creation. However, if you find a category that should be included, please let SatyrTN know so it can be included in the bots runs.
- Work is underway to improve the LGBT Portal. Please add any good quality (free) photos you come across on LGBT articles to the gallery here. Also if anyone would like to volunteer to help in maintaining the portal, please make yourselves known on the Portal's talkpage.
- If you see any articles for deletion or any other deletion discussions related to LGBT topics, please remember to add them to the deletion sorting board. Thanks!
- Member News
- Our membership continues to expand. 22 new users have joined the WikiProject: Garik, Esrever, mlbedwell, Jet123, Welland R, Auriel, DaliJim, queerpeace, SUIT, Mentality, Nukleoptra, LeaHazel, lindleyle, Justin Eiler, Bylandl, Brent Calderwood, PC78, Gekedo, polymathematics, Coryarlo, Ziji, mcgarymi. Please make them feel welcome!
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line.
If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Dev920 know.
|
|
SatyrBot 05:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive
Thank you for your contributions! -- WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive 17:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
|
|
The Ed Poor Audacious Action Award |
For your bold and humble assistance in assessing biography articles, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Ed Poor Audacious Action Award. 17:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Golden Wiki Award |
For your exceptional contributions to the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Golden Wiki Award. 17:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Why do you consider my deletion vandalism? Clarityfiend 17:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I think I misidentified your work as vandalism. I'm still working out Twinkle, and I was going fairly quickly. I recognized that I had made a mistake, but I didn't want to revert it because it seemed as though you and another editor were going at it over something. I wanted to get out before screwing it up anymore, as I didn't know the history behind the fight. Sorry, happy editing. HornandsoccerTalk 17:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please cease your deleting my editing of Dark Ages
I am trying to improve the page on Dark Ages.
The current article is NOT an article about Dark Ages, but is instead a Eurocentric discussion on the historiography of the Dark Age concept. It has been moved in its entirety to Western European Dark Ages where it is appropriate. I am reverting to my attempt to correct the article by comparing Dark Ages for all civilisations, not just looking at the European concept.
I would appreciate your assistance.
Regards
John D. Croft 02:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, gotcha, sorry about the issue. FYI, there's a template somewhere (sorry, I don't have the link handy) that says something to the effect of 'This article is currently undergoing a major revision. Please do not edit it until this template is removed'. Alternatively, you could create a subpage of your userpage and use that as a sandbox. Again, sorry about that. HornandsoccerTalk 02:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adminship
I've already had one RfA, and I don't really want to put myself through that again. Thank you for the offer though. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 08:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, wow, after that, I don't think I'd want to go through it again either. Nevertheless, I'm sure you'd make a great admin. Have a nice day! HornandsoccerTalk 13:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi... i see you are an expert in wikipedia. I ask if you can help me with some stuff i don't know how to do it here.
If you have MSN or something please contact me, here is my email -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Costa1143
Cya ;)This unsigned comment was left by User:Costa1143
- Sure, I'd be glad to help you. Are you looking for me to adopt you? If so, I'd be willing to do so, but be aware that you would be my first pupil. Let me know if you'd like to do this. HornandsoccerTalk 03:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I thought your objection to the inclusion of The Seventh-Day Evangelist Church is based on an unreasonable judgement. The article provides facts which you cannot refute and the same time you made the choice which I respect but disagree with.
|