Talk:International Brigades

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spain Portal This article is part of WikiProject Spain which aims to to expand and organise information better in articles related to the history, languages, and cultures of Spain. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Contents 1 Flag 2 Pact? 3 Dates 4 Orwell 5 on personalities including Orwell (who were or were not in the brigades) 6 Sculpture 7 Ken Loach 8 Apolônio de Carvalho 9 Nationalities 10 Sweeping Statement 11 Battle of jarama section

[edit] Flag

Is the flag depicted on this page one that was used during the war, or is it a modern combination of two designs: the three-cornered star & the flag of the Spanish Republic? --Apeloverage 13:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pact?

Hitler-Stalin Pact or Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact? Hitler-Stalin Pact betrays some bias, doesn't it? It mainly is used by Historians with a certain anti-communist political stance. --84.195.233.101 17:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dates

How come the year is missing in the dates in this article ? Hmmm.... When did this happen ? -- PFHLai 04:33, 2004 Oct 14 (UTC)

Usually, the year is mentionned in the beginning of a section and the dates refer to this year. I though mentionning the year for every instance would be somewhat "heavy"... but you're free to correct this if you think it's necessary. Rama 05:54, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Orwell

I see that Orwell is listed as being "involved" with the International Brigade - I'm not an expert, but his personal page says that he was in the POUM, which while not "the other side", was certainly another side (and, in fact, I don't know if he would have fought against the Brigade in Barcelona or not.) Should he be listed on this page? (anonymous coward)

I was thinking the same thing. Yes, he was with the POUM which is not related to the International Brigade. --Tothebarricades.tk 03:26, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Good point ! Rama 07:46, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Orwell would not have been involved in the failed Trotskist uprising In Barcelona as he had already been invalided home after being wounded in action against Italian troops. Although not a member of the brigades he certainly deserves mention as a volunteer for liberty Redvark 11:00, 15th Nov 2004 (GMT)

Orwell was indeed caught up in the May fighting, after partially recovering from his wounds; the second half of Homage to Catalonia is an account of the disturbance, his escape, and a criticism of attempts in most socialist publications to portray the conflict in Barcelona as a failed Trotskyist uprising (and, really, whoever you support, the real conflict was between the communists/government and anarchists).--Djmit44 21:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Orwell keeps coming in and out of this article... we really should do something about it ! Perhaps a section "personalities who were NOT in the Brigades" ? :D Rama 19:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] on personalities including Orwell (who were or were not in the brigades)

I have taken the step of removing a para in the introductions which read:

Many important artists and writers were in Spain at the time, including W.H. Auden and George Orwell. Ernest Hemingway also was there as a war reporter for the NANA, and spent time on the front line -- see For Whom the Bell Tolls, as well as André Malraux (l'Espoir), or Simone Weil.

I am not 100% certain, but I think that not one of these people were in the international brigades. Orwell, of course, was with the POUM; Hemingway was a journalist; Malraux a pilot. Weil with the CNT as I understand it, and was Auden at the front at all?

If other people feel strongly about having a focal para on celebrities at the beginning of the article, maybe someone should write one about actual members. I would argue:

- The issue of artist and writer involvement is certainly of interest, but it is dealt with on the main spanish civil war page where famous names are mentioned. Or perhaps there is a rationale for a dedicated page on artistic impact of the war?

- There is a section on personalities anyway further down.

- Personally I think - why do we need such a focus on a cult of celebrity when we talk about these volunteers? The vast majority of them, in the IBs and in the militias, were ordinary working class people willing to fight and die for their beliefs. Do they need glorifying with the names of writers and artists? --Bengalski 19:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sculpture

I'd like to put something on the sculpture by Ian Walters in London that reads:

"They went because their open eyes could see no other way" Should it go on this page, or elsewhere? Mark Richards 21:10, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I think this certainly has its place on the page. Now, the question of where ("Status of the Brigades after the war" or a new section ?), I'll leave it to your imagination ! :) Do you have a photograph of the statue ? Rama 21:26, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ken Loach

The article says "Ken Loach is not sympathetic to the brigades", which is a complete nonsense. Loach is a socialist, of course he's "sympathetic" to th IB. The film in question, Land and Freedom, is critical of the Stalinists, manipulated from Moscow, who controlled and distorted the efforts of the Republicans - he's not critical of the fighters or the idea itself.

But Ken Loach portrays the IB as Stalinists. Do you consider that "sympathetic". He portrays POUM are heroes and IB/PSUC as traitors. --Soman 08:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

No, the point is that the idealism of the IB was manipulated by Stalinists in the Republican government. This is a criticism of the policies of Stalin and Moscow, not of the International Brigade or their fighters, whom the film clearly shows as heroes. --Kingcal 5 April 2006

Do they? In general IB are not given very much prominence in the movie at all. One of the few scenes that actually show IB soliders is the one at the bar in Barcelona, were English-speaking IB soldier talk bad about the militias. The notion that IB were manipulated morons is hardly a sympathetic portrayal. --Soman 09:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

It's not a matter of being "manipulated morons". Most of the people who fought in the IB followed the line from Moscow because they believed the SU to be the only socialist state in the world. They followed the line because they thought it would lead them to victory, not because they were stupid. --Kingcal 14:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm the person who first put Ken Loach on to this page, in the context of his film 'Land and Freedom'. Whatever the truth of the situation was, the film certainly portrays the International Brigades and the Communist Party as on the wrong side (the main character describes the Party as "evil and corrupt" I think). --Apeloverage 13:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apolônio de Carvalho

It is not referred to IB members of portuguese or brazilian origins. Concerning Brazil approximately 20 citizens from brazilian origin would have rejoined the IB with in particular Apolônio de Carvalho (see http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apol%C3%B4nio_de_Carvalho) What about portuguese ? Is there some information, files about them ? Thank you for your answer

--81.255.121.101 11:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Added additional info on the main nationalities and the mixed brigades--68.32.11.74 20:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

==Communism? Why is this considered part of the "Communism" series? FFS

[edit] Nationalities

Isn't it strange that Russians/citizens of the USSR aren't mentioned there? --Bicycle repairman 16:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

In his book "The age of extremes", Eric Hobsbawm states that there were at least 5000 Soviets fighting for the IB (although we still don't know how many of them went there voluntarily, he adds).

I also have further doubts about the numbers in the "nationalities" section. "Scandinavian" is not a nationality in any way. Second, the number 10.000 must be a mistake, given the fact that Sweeden, the biggest scandinavian country, sent only 500 volunteers, according to the List_of_Swedes_who_died_in_the_Spanish_Civil_War article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.254.36.183 (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC).

Only about 500 Danes went as well, of which half fell [1]. So, that's 1000 Scandinavians accounted for. That leaves quite a number for the Norwegians, but according to the Norwegian Wiki "only" 100 Norwegians died fighting for the brigades. The 10,000 count seems completely unfounded. -- Hestemand 16:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sweeping Statement

"Since the fall of the Soviet bloc, the International Brigades have been quite unanimously regarded as anti-Fascist heroes, and the legitimacy of their fight has, for the most part, washed away the stain of summary executions and Stalinist manipulation"

Oh, that's so rich. Says who? Bit of an opinion there, eh?

[edit] Battle of jarama section

Just a little comment: the goal of this battle was not to capture the madrid-andalusia road. It was capturing the madrid-valencia road the aim that the nationalist rebels were looking for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.146.50.254 (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC).Don severo 11:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)