User talk:Itistoday
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Feel free to message me here.
Contents |
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pan's Labyrinth
I deleted the section about Spirited Away that you added to the Pan's Labyrinth article, since it appeared to be original research - Wikipedia policy does not allow original research. If the material you provided has been published in a reliable source, please add it back and cite the source. Thanks! Cogswobble 17:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- I can see how you might consider that to be original research, but I don't know exactly what I should do about a source. I readded the section with a link to the script, please modify the citation itself and not the entire section if you feel that there's a problem with it. -- itistoday (Talk) 21:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Never mind, I changed the link to the script to two online references. -- itistoday (Talk) 22:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks for finding that! I edited the section to include only information that was discussed in your sources. If you can find more reviews that compare the two movies, you could add more information - but I don't really think there needs to be a detailed discussion in the article - I think just noting that Pan's Labyrinth has been compared to Spirited Away is enough information. Cogswobble 22:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Ok, I added more info with crazy citation, hope it's alright. -- itistoday (Talk) 22:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- I can see that you've put a lot of effort into this - and I am not at all disagreeing with your conclusions. However, if you compare two sets of circumstances, and then draw a connection between them, that is original research. When I said you needed to cite sources, what I meant is that you need to cite a source that compares the two, not simply cite a source for each set of circumstances. The two reviews you added initially were good, because the reviewer in each case compared Pan's Labyrinth to Spirited Away. The other sources were simply references for what happened in each movie seperately.Cogswobble 22:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I added more info with crazy citation, hope it's alright. -- itistoday (Talk) 22:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] User:PopeofPeru
Regarding this edit, c'mon. What are your goals vis a vis Wikipedia? Please have some consideration for the folks working on it with you, and refrain from this type of attack. We're all in this together, and comments like that do nothing to further the goals of the project. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- I realized it needed a bit of qualification and so I added a thing to it to further explain my rational... And while you are right, that comments like that do nothing to further wikipedia, neither does deleting user's user pages without asking them or offering to bring it back if they didn't want it to be deleted. Like I said in my additions to that comment, plenty of wikipedia admins have barnstars on their pages, to me at least, this is just like that, and does not qualify to be called "myspace material". -- itistoday (Talk) 16:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to User:PopeofPeru
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- itistoday (Talk) 17:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- You don't see anything ironic about your message to this user? You were just defending PopeofPeru's right to blank pages two days ago. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- I never said he was right to blank the Reality page, instead I was trying to show that his action required special treatment from admins and that this was not to be treated like a case of ordinary vandalism, which BTW was exactly the case with that anon who blanked his page. -- itistoday (Talk) 20:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Punna
Hi Itistoday - To the Punna article that you started, I've added material from SN 35.88. However, I'm concerned that there might be multiple Punnas in the Buddhist canon and thus I might be referencing one other than the one you had in mind. (For instance, while the Punna in SN 35.88 achieves Nibbana, the sutta solely identifies him as a "clansman," not as a mahasavaka [great disciple].) Are you able to verify this? If it turns out that we are talking about two different Punnas, is there a way to recognize both in this article? Thanks for your consideration. Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- FWIW, Sacca mentioned that there's an on-line Buddhist Dictionary of Pali Proper Names which includes the article "Punna" which indicates that we are talking about the same person. One less worry? Sorry for my confusion. With metta, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
