Talk:Lady Snowblood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Lady Snowblood is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of anime and manga. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page (Talk). See our portal to learn more.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

	This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Modern Post Apocalyptic Remake

I just watched Princess Blade[1], its Japanese title was also 修羅雪姫 - is it related--ZayZayEM 05:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Split

Manga and 1973 film should be split into separate articles. - Alan Smithee 00:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's necessary, honestly. Both sections aren't that long to start with. Putting them in their own individual articles seems needless, especially when the film's an adaptation of the manga. Maybe if it was meatier, I'd support a split but right now, I don't know if that's a good idea. -- 9muses 02:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree with 9muses. There's no reason to split the article at the moment as it's not too long at all. It could bear a lot more expansion before reaching a stage where it might need splitting. H. Carver 22:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC) After growing more experienced in the ways of Wikipedia, I no longer stand by what I said here. Mea culpa. H. Carver 05:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I'd have to dissagree, however short the two are quality standards should be upheld. Bhojpuri 6:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Split. Last year I helped disambiguate all the Battle Royale spin-offs and subsequent experience shows that entries on spin-offs that are notable enough for their own entry tend to get stiffled in the main entry. They can't be expanded any further as they would unbalance the entry. Cutting them loose lets them grow so arguements based purely on the size as it is don't really work. As it stands it is big enough to form a good stub which seems reason enough. The various Battle Royale entries are often adaptations of another work but have thrived as separate entries so this one should do fine if there are editors around interested in working on it, (Emperor 04:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC))

Split. Current content should not be used to judge splitting. They are two seperate entities notable in their own right, they deserve individual pages. --ZayZayEM 06:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Split. Let them develop separately. It looks really messy at the moment. Cop 633 15:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)