Talk:Letter (alphabet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s importance scale.

Letter (alphabet) was the collaboration of the week for the week starting on March 5, 2006. For details on improvements made to the article, see history of past collaborations.

.

[edit] How should alphabets/articles be listed?

When I started this article I intended for the alphabet listings to be a directory of articles rather than lists of symbols. Accordingly, it may be more proper to list the letters of alphabets as such:

Arabic alphabet: Alif ( ﺍ‎), Beth ( ﺏ‎), Taw ( ﺕ‎), Ṯāʼ ( ﺙ‎), Gimel ( ﺝ‎), Heth ( ﺡ‎), ḫāʼ ( ﺥ‎), Dalet ( ﺩ‎), ḏāl ( ﺫ‎), Resh ( ﺭ‎), Zayin ( ﺯ‎), Shin ( ﺱ‎), Shin ( ﺵ‎), Tsade ( ﺹ‎), ḍād ( ﺽ‎), Teth ( ﻁ‎), ẓāʼ ( ﻅ‎), Ayin ( ﻉ‎), ġayn ( ﻍ‎), Pe ( ﻑ‎), Qoph ( ﻕ‎), Kaph ( ﻙ‎), Lamedh ( ﻝ‎), Mem ( ﻡ‎), Nun ( ﻥ‎), He ( هـ‎), Waw ( ﻭ‎), Yodh ( ﻱ‎)

Also problematic is that letters may have many symbols - it may be better to show one symbol paranthetically than invite countless symbols into the mix. But this is just my opinion. What is the consensus? Should the alphabet listings primarily show article names or letter symbols?

Poggio 21:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Hm. Yes, I thought about that when I added arabic letters... and I concluded that I prefer the symbols. But, if the consensus is reached that the article name should be incuded here - fine by me. Therefore, I vote neutral :-) --Dijxtra 11:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Graphemes

Would like to hear discussion on why letters are graphemes. The tricky word here is "are." From my understanding of graphemes, letters are a subset of graphemes (since graphemes include punctuation, etc). It is therefore misleading to simply state letters ARE graphemes (as one edit stated). To those unfamiliar with the technical term, grapheme, this may incorrectly imply that graphemes are synonymous with letters. Poggio 22:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Letters ARE graphemes in the same way dogs ARE animals.St jimmy 14:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

There are hundreds if not thousands of images of letters to choose from on commons [1] Which ones would be the best to show here? -- Astrokey44|talk 14:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm thinking two pictures would be good that show letters from two seperate alphabets. I really like the one with beads that you just added! Andromeda321 15:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I like the Cyrillic image showing capital, lowercase, and italics, but I'd like to see a version of such an image that also included the handwritten (script) form. Some letters look very, very differnt between the print and written forms. --EncycloPetey 10:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)