List of U.S. colleges and universities by endowment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This list of U.S. colleges and universities by endowment contains endowment numbers for large universities in the United States. A sample of university endowments outside of the U.S. has been included for comparison.
Note on the below table: The National Association of College and University Business Officers (representatives of the below institutions) assemble endowment statistics for comparison once a year in January. The last release was January 2006, and this is considered the official rankings until the January 2007 numbers are officially released. In the table below we show the ranks and values from the January 2006 report, as well as "latest" updates on the current endowment value. The latter number does not affect rank, and is for informational purposes only.[1]
Contents |
[edit] List of United States College and University Endowments[2] (NACUBO: Highest to Lowest)
*Denotes the aggregate of a cluster of institutions (university system)
[edit] List of International University Endowments
Institution | Endowment |
---|---|
University of Cambridge | $5.87B U.S. |
University of Oxford | $5.11B U.S. |
Kyoto University | $2.20B U.S. |
University of Toronto | $1.52B U.S. |
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology | $970M U.S. |
University of Melbourne | $860M U.S.[29] |
University of Sydney | $815M U.S. |
McGill University | $832.8M U.S. |
University of British Columbia | $670M U.S. |
National University of Singapore | $620M U.S. |
[edit] Largest endowments per student
While total endowment size is a useful measurement of the wealth of a university, it is not necessarily the best means of comparing the financial resources of different universities because it does not take into account the size of the institution. For example, Emory University's endowment may be more than four times larger than Smith's, but Emory's endowment also has to support more than four times as many students. As a result, the two schools have about the same amount of money to spend per student from their respective endowments. That being said, comparing the size of endowments per student can misrepresent the resources of smaller colleges because large universities can take better advantage of economies of scale and are generally able to get better returns on their investments.
Endowment to student ratios can also be misinterpreted when considering to what degree dollars actually go to their students. Large graduate schools can receive a much higher proportion of funds while undergraduates at the same institution may see a much smaller percentage spent in their interest. However, the modern university system funds all elements of the academic enterprise from a common funding pool. As a result, through the substitution effect, well funded divisions implicitly subsize less well funded divisions by relaxing the constraints on budgetary overhead.
In addition, inasmuch as most schools observe the 5% spending rule -- spending roughly 5% of their endowment each year under various regulatory mandates -- state funding of public institutions provides a form of quasi-endowment that may be measured in the billions of dollars. For example, a state subsidy of $50 million equates to an implied endowment equivalent of $1 billion. That is, having received $50 million from state allocations is as useful to a university or college as having an endowment equivalent amount of $1 billion in private endowment funds from which income may be drawn. Thus the traditional measure ignores this disparity, which is well recognized by entities such as the Carnegie endowment and other entities which compute not-for-profit metrics.
Likewise, each dollar drawn into an institution via the research funding channel provides a similar quasi-endowment equivalent. Therefore a $50 million dollar increment in an institution's research budget replaces the need to stockpile $1 billion in equivalent liquid instruments. Such institutions typically place into service many millions -- if not hundreds of millions -- of dollars worth of capital equipment each year, thus the capital stock of large research institutions is both retired and replaced more frequently. A large research institution may turn over its entire capital stock in the course of a decade, and the resulting churn in infrastructure value also represents an implied endowment or quasi-endowment of many billions of dollars.
Thus true inter-institutional endowment comparisions which do not detail quasi-endowments represented by state funding initiatives as well as external research funding grossly mistate the comparability between institutions which may, or may not, be inherently non-comparable.
Rank | Institution | Endowment per Student (2005) | Endowment per Student (2006) |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Princeton University | $1,679,380 | |
2. | Yale University | $1,342,099 | |
3. | Harvard University | $1,291,051 | |
4. | Grinnell College | $893,666 | |
5. | Pomona College | $837,825 | |
6. | Swarthmore College | $789,735 | |
7. | Rice University | $726,147 | |
8. | Stanford University | $714,620 | |
9. | Amherst College | $698,469 | $820,846 [26] |
10. | Williams College | $666,193 | |
11. | California Institute of Technology | $653,726 | |
12. | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | $650,430 | |
13. | Wellesley College | $557,243 | |
14. | Dartmouth College | $475,859 | |
15. | Northwestern University | $440,068 | |
16. | Baylor College of Medicine | $426,326 | |
17. | Smith College | $361,572 | |
18. | Emory University | $360,662 | |
19. | Washington University in St. Louis | $319,015 | |
20. | University of Notre Dame | $317,991 | |
21. | Berry College | $290,715 |
[edit] Institutions (NACUBO Data[[1]]: top 25 in absolute size) by 20 year endowment growth
Rank Order | Name | Aggregate Arithmetic Growth ) | Per Annum Exponential Growth ) | Endowment in 2006 | Endowment in 1986 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | University of Michigan | 2247% | 15.56% | $5,652,262 | $251,517 |
2. | Tufts University | 1215% | 12.49% | $1,215,413 | $100,000[30] |
3. | Duke University | 1140% | 12.59% | $4,497,718 | $362,706 |
4. | University of Notre Dame | 1041% | 12.17% | $4,436,624 | $388,965 |
5. | University of Virginia | 963% | 11.82% | $3,618,172 | $340,387 |
6. | Yale | 937% | 11.69% | $18,030,600 | $1,739,460 |
7. | University of Pennsylvania | 884% | 11.43% | $5,313,268 | $540,084 |
8. | Stanford | 837% | 11.19% | $14,084,676 | $1,502,583 |
9. | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 761% | 10.77% | $8,368,066 | $971,346 |
10. | University of Southern California | 747% | 10.69% | $3,065,935 | $361,784 |
11. | Harvard | 742% | 10.65% | $28,915,706 | $3,435,013 |
12. | Northwestern | 625% | 9.9% | $5,140,668 | $709,236 |
13. | Princeton | 575% | 9.54% | $13,044,900 | $1,934,010 |
14. | Vanderbilt | 560% | 9.43% | $2,946,392 | $446,458 |
15. | Emory | 554% | 9.39% | $4,870,019 | $745,188 |
16. | Dartmouth | 547% | 9.34% | $3,092,100 | $477,774 |
17. | Cornell | 541% | 9.29% | $4,321,199 | $673,848 |
18. | University of Chicago | 506% | 9.01% | $4,867,030 | $802,500 |
19. | Rice | 427% | 8.31% | $3,986,664 | $755,782 |
20. | University of Texas | 423% | 8.27% | $13,234,848 | $2,530,730 |
21. | Case Western Reserve | 420% | 8.25% | $1,598,566 | $307,250 |
22. | Texas A&M System | 408% | 8.13% | $5,642,978 | $1,110,440 |
23. | Washington University | 389% | 7.93% | $4,684,737 | $958,461 |
24. | Johns Hopkins | 378% | 7.82% | $2,350,749 | $491,543 |
25. | Columbia | 369% | 7.72% | $5,937,814 | $1,266,640 |
[edit] Notes
UW Foundation's site has changed. Link for 33 should be: http://www.uwfoundation.wisc.edu/home/findgiftopportunity/giving_questions/givingfaq.aspx
- ^ http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/FY05NESInstitutionsbyTotalAssets.pdf
- ^ http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/2006NES_Listing.pdf
- ^ Harvard's endowment up to $29.2 billion. Associated Press (2006). Retrieved on September 19, 2006.
- ^ Yale Endowment Earns 22.9% In The Past Year. Yale University (2006). Retrieved on September 26, 2006.
- ^ WELL-FUNDED Stanford's endowment purse grows fatter. NACUBO (2006). Retrieved on October 11, 2006.
- ^ http://www.utsystem.edu/news/2006/UTIMCO-CEOResigns-09-05-06.htm
- ^ http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2006/10/27/news/16400.shtml
- ^ http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/endowment.html
- ^ http://finance.columbia.edu/controller/resources/reports-33061-TheTrusteesofColumbiaUniversityintheCityofNewYork.pdf
- ^ a b c d e f g h http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a2yzjDFci6_8&refer=home
- ^ U-M endowment at $5.7 billion. Ann Arbor News (2006). Retrieved on January 2, 2007.
- ^ http://www.northwestern.edu/about/facts/
- ^ University of Chicago fact sheet. The University of Chicago (2006). Retrieved on November 11, 2006.
- ^ http://annualreport.wustl.edu/auditor.pdf
- ^ http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/2006NES_Listing.pdf
- ^ http://www.nd.edu/~invest/
- ^ http://www.alumni.cornell.edu/endowment.htm
- ^ http://minerva.acc.virginia.edu/Facts/Glance_FinanceEndowment.htm
- ^ http://www.dartmouth.edu/home/about/facts.html#endowment
- ^ http://www.browndailyherald.com/media/storage/paper472/news/2006/10/18/CampusNews/U.s-Endowment.Reaches.2.3.Billion-2374111.shtml?norewrite200610230904&sourcedomain=www.browndailyherald.com
- ^ http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/04/2007040308n.htm |- bgcolor=#DDEEFF |University of Washington || $1.73 || $2.00 |- bgcolor=#DDEEFF |Ohio State University || $1.726 || $1.996<ref>[http://oncampus.osu.edu/article.php?id=819 University endowment hits $2 billion]</li> <li id="_note-15">'''[[#_ref-15|^]]''' http://mac10.umc.pitt.edu/m/FMPro?-db=ma&-lay=a&-format=d.html&id=2788&-Find</li> <li id="_note-16">'''[[#_ref-16|^]]''' http://www.williams.edu/alumni/campaign/about/report06/06williams_coolidge.pdf</li> <li id="_note-17">'''[[#_ref-17|^]]''' http://www.pomona.edu/ADWR/Admissions/Forms/2010fullprofile.pdf</li> <li id="_note-BC">'''[[#_ref-BC_0|^]]''' {{cite news|url=http://www.bcheights.com/media/storage/paper144/news/2006/04/10/News/University.Finances.On.The.Rise-1803485.shtml?norewrite200605040526&sourcedomain=www.bcheights.com|publisher=The Heights|date=[[April 10]], [[2006]]|title=University Finances On The Rise}}</li> <li id="_note-amherst">^ [[#_ref-amherst_0|<sup>'''''a'''''</sup>]] [[#_ref-amherst_1|<sup>'''''b'''''</sup>]] http://www.amherst.edu/about_amh/glance.html</li> <li id="_note-18">'''[[#_ref-18|^]]''' http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/2006NES_Listing.pdf</li> <li id="_note-19">'''[[#_ref-19|^]]''' http://www.uwfoundation.wisc.edu/web/www.nsf/allpublished/frequently+asked+questions UW System endownment is approximately 9.5 billion, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Wisconsin_System</li> <li id="_note-20">'''[[#_ref-20|^]]''' [http://www.unimelb.edu.au/publications/docs/investment_report2005.pdf University of Melbourne Investment Report, 2005]</li> <li id="_note-21">'''[[#_ref-21|^]]''' http://www.tufts.edu/development/ways_to_give/endowments.html</li></ol></ref>
[edit] References
- 2006 National Association of College and University Business Officers Endowment Study (PDF)
- 2005 National Association of College and University Business Officers Endowment Study (PDF)
- Yale Posts Highest Endowment Returns, Topping Stanford, Harvard (November 22, 2005). Bloomberg.com.
- Colleges/Universities: Endowment per Student for 2004