Talk:NARAL Pro-Choice America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, which collaborates on articles related to abortion, abortion law, the abortion debate, and the history of abortion. To participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
The previous version of this favored by Meelar is hostile in tone to NARAL. The language was anything but neutral.
[edit] FactCheck/Attack Ad
I have restored the section. I think the whole article is fairly sympathetic. Like any number of advocacy groups, NARAL has been known to play it fast and loose with the facts. While every incident is not notable, this one is current pertaining to politics. If anyone sees the ad and decides to look up NARAL, they should see this information.--Tznkai 14:12, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- OK, I can see your point. How about we remove it if/when Roberts is confirmed? In a historical sense, it doesn't rise to encyclopedicness, but it could be useful right now. Best, Meelar (talk) 14:17, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Not a problem. If we kept every lame attack ad every advocacy group ever made we could make a brand new wiki.--Tznkai 14:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
By the way, the ad is discussed in more detail here. I actually used the same factcheck.org piece you did. You might want to rephrase the bit about "false accusations," as what they said is more misleading than false. He "supported" them, but not about bombing. Enjoy, Dave (talk) 17:34, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
- I was using the words that factcheck did actually, but go ahead and change if you wish--Tznkai 17:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
