User talk:NeoChaosX
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
---|
/Archive1 May 2005 - July 2006 |
/Archive2 July 2006 - January 2007 |
[edit] Ittan
Thank you very much! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ittan (talk • contribs).
[edit] Was this removal approved?
See this edit. Jinxmchue 21:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- To my knowledge, no. The thing is it's been rewritten, but it's sort of tough for me to tell if it still counts as a copyvio, since the basic structure of the original text is there, but a good amount of the words have been replaced. At the very least it could be AfD'd, but I'm not well known on conspiracy or FBI topics to know if this program was notable. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jamify on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jamify. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ryanbomber 13:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I think some editors (including me, until just now) have developed a mistaken impression that you were involved in the speedy deletion. On second look, as far as I can tell you just closed the AfD when you realised the article had been deleted. It would help if you could clarify this at the DRV. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Do you know these guys???
San Jose Sharks vs. St. Louis Blues, November 28, 2006
I just saw that you spend much time with the article of the San Jose Sharks. Can you tell the names of the two players on the picture above? I would say it's Mark Smith (left) and Curtis Brown (right). Do you agree? --80.131.218.253 22:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- If I could clearly see the numbers, it'd be easier for me. Brown is definitely the player on the right; as for the player on the left, I'm not completely certain it could be Smith; he sort of reminds me of Mark Bell as well. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, but if you take a closer look at the fully enlarged picture you can see some blonde hair on the back of the head of the left player. This seems typical for Smith, haven't seen Bell with blonde hair yet. --80.131.218.253 23:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right, that's definately not Bell; it probably is Smith - I'm not completely sure, but considering he's the only Shark who dyes his hair, I'd take your word for it. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Queenland Christian Soccer Association Page
Hi,
I setup the QCSA page a couple of weeks back with the intention of getting all our clubs to put some info about their clubs on to it similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane_Mens_Football.
I know that my next page Rivers Baptist Soccer Club was probably a bit of advertising but as I was finding information to not make it advertising it got deleted. How happy am I???
I am new to wikipedia and trying to help out our clubs get a little bit of a presence on the web and I was working out how to do it.
I was trying to make it comply but didn't get a chance.
Ah well it looks like it is gone now.
Thanks, Qcsachair 03:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My Vandalism
Odd. Usually I get an orange-yellowish warning tag when people leave me a message. To be frank, I was hoping to get nailed by AntiVandalBot. My associates and I are conducting an experiment to see the bot has an "anon bias", but for the last three days not one single page we have hit has been reverted by AVB. This is becoming frustrating. 75.6.216.202 07:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, the bots aren't the quickest way to do anything, but it fixes some of the more obvious vandalism. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Granada
Hi, I am working on some pages about the history of Colombia, and i noticed that you changed a redirect page i had done, and also deleted the contents.
The Viceroyalty of New Granada and The Republic of New Granada, are SEPARATED former countries, divided years apart.
The country that is now Colombia came to be after the transformation of the Colonies of Spain, in the following order,
- The Royal Audiency of Santa Fe
- The New Kingdom of Granada
- The Viceroyalty of New Granada
- The United Provinces of New Granada
- The Great Colombia
- The Republic of the New Granada
- The Granadine Confederation
- The United States of Colombia
- The Republic of Colombia
im trying to create different pages that way i can expand them without having to look back to my sources, so please direct any concern to me before deleting or redirecting material to this pages. mijotoba 07:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I wasn't aware of this. I saw the mostly blank article, and wasn't sure what to do with it, so I decided to redirect to the only other New Granada article there was. My apologies. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
Sorry, missed that bit. Thanks for the heads up. --Fang Aili talk 01:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] bulldogs
Please check out my reply to your post plus another I've made on the same page. Keesiewonder talk 10:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Archives
Oh, my bad. – Someguy0830 (T | C)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:JoeThornton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JoeThornton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Csu-seal.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Csu-seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re: List of Swiss artists
Note that there's already Category:Swiss artists, so having such a list is redudant. Additionally, the creator, Vspano (talk • contribs), originally created the article with a single entry, with a link to a site belonging to a "Vincent Spano". That's why I put marked the articles as spam. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, agreed it may be redundant, but that's not CSD. Anyway, give him time to work on the list, if he comes back tomorrow, and it still only has one person on it, then it's probably spam. Newbies can be pretty slow at creating new articles. Part Deux 08:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re: Guinea
If you look carefully you'll see i did a simple revert because someone had trashed the page. I'm not sure what was incorrect about that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.13.108.123 (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] oops
Thanks. I meant to do that but obviously something went amiss (closed the window without confirming or something). Bucketsofg 02:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] excuse me?
"Ahem. Angelofdeath, please read Wikipedia:No original research. Fan websites and forums are not considered reliable sources, thus the entire criticism section is original research. I'm removing that section. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)"
..Who said that ENITRE section is solely from fansites? I sure most certainly did NOT. Candy Panda implyed it but I most definatly did not come my mouth. You should not even assumed that in the first place. "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 19:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I am replying to your message about making changes in the Uruaguay article:
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Uruguay. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I corrected the population from 6 million to 3 million. For whatever reason the bottom of the page was deleted. Any attempt by me to correct the population figure causes the bottom of the page to be deleted. Maybe you should correct the population and see what happens.
[edit] Uberfic, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberfic (2nd nomination)
Please take a look at the sources I've supplied for the Uberfic article. I've never heard this term either, until now, but 15 minutes of researched turned up 3 independent nontrivial sources. I'd like to see if this changes your mind as the nominator —siroχo 16:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the help
Thanks for the help, I was just trying to follow the directions so I assumed it was correct (even though it did look weird). Again, thanks.
Chad Hennings 20:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peyton Manning Article
Please do not add your own views, that is considered vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.43 (talk) 04:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
- That was a mistake. I thought that infomation had been readded to article, not removed. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Douglas Murray
Oh, I might have screwed up. But I learned that he doesn't really like being called 'Doug'. He prefers being called (and is always using) 'Douglas Murray'. Might be that 'Douglas' is a (somewaht) normal swedish name, 'Doug' isn't.
I just wanted to let him be listed under his preferred name. Hdw 21:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- well fuck this, I'm not going to bother. Hdw 21:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am sorry about causing any trouble I am new here and as you can see DO NOT KNOW how to handle this kind of "page creation". (dont know what to call it) I am sorry for the trouble.
[edit] Paper football
While I agree with your edits, I'm going to have to suggest that you don't revert on that page any more today, lest you get slapped with a 3-revert-rule block. Veinor (talk to me) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm aware of that. I'll stop for now, but I really wish I could get a few more editors to watch over this article to make sure it's not overriden with spam again. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- The guy's on a final warning for spamming and I've got the page on my watchlist. Veinor (talk to me) 22:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re:Xinet Fullpress
I'd appreciate it if you would put back the Xinet FullPress page, you deleted it before I had any time to respond, but I'm guessing from the general malaise that affects wikipedia of people that you couldn't give a monkeys —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ex800 (talk • contribs).
[edit] re: San Jose Sharks
Hello,
You seem to be one of the top moderators of the Sharks section on Wikipedia. For starters I think the Sharks section is very well set up. I don't mind that you deleted the notable alumni section I added. The Sharks Wiki page use to have one several months ago, but was removed. Notable Alumni wouldn't be a bad addition to show more team history, but it's no big deal.
Also, I added Tom Preissing to the key youth players in 03-04 as he was team rookie of the year and has since become a fine 2-3 defenseman.
Here's to continued success. Always nice to find another fan of Team Teal.
SFW —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SureFineWhatever (talk • contribs).
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:JediKnight-cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:JediKnight-cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Rebelguys2 talk 05:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Angry Nerd
Your wish is granted :) IrishGuy talk 09:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 'Might Guy'? Not really.
No. The original Japanese name would NOT be 'Might Guy' any more than Lee's would be 'Rock Lee.' See, that's not how the Japanese speak OR spell. 'Ai' is the only way to make the long 'i' sound, so far as I've seen. Not 'igh' and not 'uy.' That's ridiculous. Also, we see them adding vowels onto the ends of names. In Death Note, Light becomes 'Raito' Lee, you may have noticed, is technically 'Rocku Ri.' Only 'Ri' sounds KIND OF like it's got a BIT of an 'l.' 'Might Guy' would be pronounced 'Mee-guh-hut Gooey.' Okay? So you're wrong, I'm afraid. 'Might Guy' is how they TRANSLATED IT FOR ENGLISH SPEAKERS. Something I don't agree with. It's a JAPANESE MANGA we can use some Japanese pronunciations! But...don't you think you're a bit late in the game? I've stopped. I had WALKED AWAY. You've won. I've gone off to spread my radical name-spellings elsewhere. Tread carefully on blog-sites, I could be spreading my sedition there, as well. Also, I am SO SORRY for speaking this way. And I am really, truly not being sarcastic when I say that. I'm sorry for it; I just don't take it back. But...couldn't we do something where in the opening bit we state that both names could maybe be accepted? That would make me really happy, and it wouldn't be TRULY wrong, would it? Lynna669 03:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Lynna669
[edit] Yep I do have a resource.
I got the information from one of my friends who is way further in the series than alot of people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kabutos hidden shadow (talk • contribs) 02:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Nomination fix
Thanks for fixing my AFD nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pars Society. The templates have obviously changed since I last started an AFD - somewhat ironic since I'm partly responsible for the choice of AFD categories offered, and especially since I was nominating on behalf of somebody else who didn't know the procedure! For future reference, do you have any idea what I mistyped? It looks like some of the subst: instructions didn't work, but it's been a while since I played about with templates so really can't work it out. Cheers, TheGrappler 18:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ahh, so the problem was that the template is more clever than I am. Will bear this in mind in future! TheGrappler 18:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Noble House
I really appreciate your candidness. Thanks. DGG 08:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)