New Austrian Tunnelling method
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The New Austrian Tunneling method (NATM) was developed between 1957 and 1965 in Austria. It was given its name in Salzburg in 1962 to distinguish it from old Austrian tunnelling approach. The main contributors to the development of NATM were Ladislaus von Rabcewicz, Leopold Müller and Franz Pacher. The main idea is to use the geological stress of the surrounding rock mass to stabilize the tunnel itself.
Contents |
[edit] Principles
The NATM is an approach of philosophy integrating the principles of the behaviour of rock masses under load and monitoring the performance of underground construction during construction. The fact is that the NATM is not a set of specific excavation and support techniques.
There are seven features on which is NATM based:
- Mobilization of the strength of rock mass - The method relies on the inherent strength of the surrounding rock mass being conserved as the main component of tunnel support. Primary support is directed to enable rock support itself.
- Shotcrete protection - Loosening and excessive rock deformation must be minimised. This is achieved by applying thin layer of shotcrete immediately after face advance.
- Measurements - Every deformation of excavation must be measured. NATM requires installation of sophisticated measurement instrumentation. It is embedded in lining, ground, and boreholes.
- Flexible support - The primary lining is thin and reflects recent strata conditions. Used is rather active than passive support and strengthening is not by thicker concrete lining but by a flexible combination of rock bolts, wire mesh and steel ribs.
- Closing of invert - Quickly closing of invert and create load-bearing ring is imporant. It is crucial in soft grounded tunnels where no section of tunnel should be left open even temporarily
- Contractual arrangements - Since the NATM is based on monitoring measurements, changes in support and construction method are possible. This is possible only if the contractual system enables those changes
- Rock mass classification determines support measures - There are main rock classes for tunnels and corresponding support. These serve as the guidelines for tunnel reinforcement.
Based on the computation of the optimal cross section, just a thin shotcrete protection is necessary. It is applied immediately behind the Tunnel boring machine, to create a natural load-bearing ring and therefore to minimize the rock's deformation. Additionally, geotechnical instruments are installed to measure the later deformation of excavation. Therefore a monitoring of the stress distribution within the rock is possible.
This monitoring makes the method very flexible, even at surprising changes of the geomechanical rock consistency during the tunneling work, e.g. by crevices or pit water. Such (usual) problems are not solved by thicker shotcrete, but the reinforcement is done by wired concrete which can be combined with steel ribs or lug bolts.
The measured rock properties lead to the appropriate tools for tunnel strengthening. Therefore in the last decade NATM was also applied to soft ground excavations and to tunnels in porous sediments. The flexible NATM technique enables immediate adjustments in the construction details, but this requires a flexible contractual system, too.
[edit] Philosophy and controversial names
When tunneling engineers talk on NATM, they often mean different things because some of them define it as a special technique, but others as a sort of philosophy. Recently the scene has been complicated by new terms and even alternative names, when discussing certain aspects of NATM. This is partly caused by an increased use of the method in the USA, particularly in soft ground conditions (see External links).
Besides the official name New Austrian Tunneling Method other designations are used in the last years, e.g. Sequential Excavation Method (SEM), or Sprayed Concrete Lining (SCL). In Japan sometimes other names were used, e.g. Centre Dividing Wall NATM, or Cross Diaphragm Method (both abbreviated as CDM), and even Upper Half Vertical Subdivision method (UHVS). Evidently, the scientists and the tunneling industry cannot find an unified name for this wide-used method.
As defined by the Austrian Society of Engineers and Architects, the NATM constitutes a method where the surrounding rock or soil formations of a tunnel are integrated into an overall ring-like support structure. Thus the supporting formations will themselves be part of this supporting structure.
But many engineers already refer to as NATM, when shotcrete is proposed for initial ground support of an open-face tunnel. Especially with reference to soft ground, the term NATM can be misleading. As noted by Emit Brown, NATM can refer to both a design philosophy and a construction method.
[edit] Key features
According to E.Brown (Weblink 2), the key features of the design philosophy refer to:
- The strength of the ground around a tunnel is deliberately mobilised to the maximum extent possible.
- Mobilisation of ground strength is achieved by allowing controlled deformation control of the ground.
- Initial primary support is installed having load-deformation characteristics appropriate to the ground conditions, and installation is timed with respect to ground deformations.
- Instrumentation is installed to monitor deformations in the initial support system, as well as to form the basis of varying the initial support design and the sequence of excavation.
When NATM is seen as a construction method, the key features are:
- The tunnel is sequentially excavated and supported, and the excavation sequences can be varied.
- The initial ground support is provided by shotcrete in combination with fibre or welded-wire fabric reinforcement, steel arches (usually lattice girders), and sometimes ground reinforcement (e.g. soil nails, spiling).
- The permanent support is usually (but not always) a cast-in-place concrete lining.
Some experts note that many of these construction methods were used in the US and elsewhere in soft-ground applications, before NATM was described in the literature.
In an article of 2002 Romero states the major difference between the viewpoints of design and of construction: The deformation of the soil (rem.: at soft-ground tunnels) is not easily ‘controlled’. Therefore it can be concluded that the excavation and support planned for sequentially excavated, shotcrete-lined tunnels .. utilises NATM construction methods but not necessarily NATM design methods. These details are less essential at tunnels in solid or fair rock.
[edit] See also
[edit] Further reading
- Johann Golser, The New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM), Theoretical Background & Practical Experiences. 2nd Shotcrete conference, Easton (USA), 4-8 Oct 1976.
