Of Pandas and People

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title Of Pandas and People

Author	Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon
Publisher	Foundation for Thought and Ethics
Released	1989
Media type	Hardcover
Pages	170
Size and weight	1.40 pounds
ISBN	ISBN 0-914513-40-0

Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of Biological Origins (ISBN 0-914513-40-0) is a controversial 1989 (2nd edition 1993) school-level textbook written by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon and published by the Texas-based Foundation for Thought and Ethics (FTE). It espouses the idea of intelligent design (ID)—namely that life shows evidence of being designed by an intelligent agent (i.e. God; see creationism). Intelligent design is considered to be pseudoscience^[1] by the scientific community,^[2] primarily because it invokes supernatural powers, makes no predictions and cannot be verified through repeatable experiments. The book presents various polemical arguments against the scientific theory of evolution.

Contents 1 Overview 2 Editions 3 Origins and promotion 4 Controversies 4.1 1989 - 1993 4.2 1994 - 1998 4.3 1999 - 2003 4.4 2004 - 2005: Dover, Pennsylvania 4.5 Campaign to declare Of Pandas and People the "Banned Book of the Year" 5 References 6 See also 7 External links 7.1 Pro-intelligent design/creationism 7.2 Pro-science 7.3 Media

[edit] Overview

The book argues that "the origin of new organisms [can be located] in an immaterial cause: in a blueprint, a plan, a pattern, devised by an intelligent agent." The text is non-committal on the age of the Earth, commenting that "Some [ID proponents] take the view that the earth's history can be compressed into a framework of thousands of years, while others adhere to the standard old earth chronology." The book raises a number of objections to the theory of evolution, such as the alleged lack of transitional fossils, gaps in the fossil record and the apparent sudden appearance ex nihilo of "already intact fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks, and wings, etc." The book makes no reference to the identity of the intelligent designer.

The title Of Pandas and People is a reference to a scientific controversy about the giant panda. The panda was once thought to have a "thumb," which is in fact an evolved sesamoid bone. Many of the book's arguments are identical to those raised by creationists, which have been dismissed by mainstream scientists. ^[3] In fact, a comparison of an early draft of Of Pandas and People to a later 1987 copy showed how in several instances the word "creationism" had been replaced by "intelligent design", and "creationist" simply replaced by "intelligent design proponent". ^[4]

Scientific and education professional groups have strongly criticized Of Pandas and People and have opposed its use in schools. Science educator Gerald Skoog described it as "a vehicle to advance sectarian tenets and not to improve science education" and said "This book has no potential to improve science education and student understanding of the natural world."^[5]

A review^[6] of Of Pandas and People by paleontologist Kevin Padian of the University of California at Berkeley for the National Center for Science Education's Bookwatch Reviews in 1989 called the book a "wholesale distortion of modern biology," and says that FTE's writers had misrepresented such topics as the Cambrian explosion, the history of birds, and the concept of homology. Padian described the treatment of homology in Of Pandas and People as "shameful," citing:

“

They pretend that the Tasmanian wolf, a marsupial, would be placed (classified) with the placental wolf if evolutionists weren't so hung up on the single character of their reproductive mode by which marsupials and placentals are traditionally separated. This is a complete falsehood, as anyone with access to the evidence knows. It is not a matter of a single reproductive character, but dozens of characters in the skull, teeth, post-cranial bones (including the marsupial pelvic bones), soft anatomy, and biochemistry, to say nothing of their respective fossil records, that separate the two mammals. About the closest similarity they have going for them is that they are both called "wolf" in English. The same criticism can be applied seriatim to the authors' mystifying discussion of the red and giant "pandas."

”

Padian's conclusion was: "It is hard to say what is worst in this book: the misconceptions of its sub-text, the intolerance for honest science, or the incompetence with which science is presented. In any case, teachers should be warned against using this book."^[7]

[edit] Editions

There are currently two editions of the book, the 1989 first edition edited by Charles Thaxton, and the 1993 second edition, which included a "Note to Teachers" by Mark D. Hartwig and Stephen C. Meyer. A forthcoming third edition is to be retitled The Design of Life. Jon Buell, the president of the Foundation for Thought and Ethics, said that the ruling in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District that intelligent design was religious would make the textbook "radioactive" in public schools and would be "catastrophic" for the marketability of both the present (second) edition and the forthcoming third edition, citing possible losses of around half a million dollars. The renaming of the book is viewed by some as way of mitigating this and at the same time distancing the book from past controversy.

[edit] Origins and promotion

The book is published by the Foundation for Thought and Ethics (FTE), a non-profit organization founded by Jon Buell in Richardson, Texas in 1980. The foundation was established for the purpose of "promoting and publishing textbooks presenting a Christian perspective," according to its Internal Revenue Service tax exemption submission. The FTE alluded in its submission to its first project, the publication of a book "showing the scientific evidence for creation."

The Pandas and People project was initiated in the mid-1980s after the FTE commissioned a poll of high-school science teachers in 1985 to show potential publishers that a market existed for a school textbook on creationism. The FTE sought a publisher for the book, telling a Boston firm that they could expect revenue of over $6.5 million in five years based upon "modest expectations for the market." If creationist teaching in schools was explicitly permitted by the Supreme Court of the United States in a case that was then ongoing, the FTE's founder Jon Buell wrote that "you can throw out these projections, the nationwide market would be explosive!" ^[8]

The creationism case in question — Edwards v. Aguillard — was decided by the Supreme Court in 1987. The court determined that teaching creationism in public schools violated the Establishment Clause of the United States constitution, but that alternative scientific theories could be taught. While the decision ruled out any return to teaching traditional Young Earth creationism in science classes, it did offer an opening for those willing to recast creationist doctrine in the language of science.

The outcome of the case prompted major editorial changes to the book. It was initially focused entirely on creationism but was extensively edited to refer to "intelligent design" instead. The first draft was called Creation Biology (1983); the next was Biology and Creation (1986); the third, Biology and Origin (1987); and later in 1987, the authors settled on the final title, Of Pandas and People. ^[9] They also deleted more than 250 references to "creationism" and the "creator" and replaced them in the final version with "intelligent design" and "intelligent designer." ^[10] (and in one case a reference to "creationists" was replaced by "cdesign proponentsists" (sic)) ^[11]. FTE founder Jon Buell claims that the word creationism was a "placeholder term" whose definition "changed to include a religious context after the draft was written, so the writers changed the word." ^[12]

Of Pandas and People was eventually published by "Haughton Publishing Co." This was the trade name of a Mesquite, Texas printing firm, Horticultural Printers, Inc., which mainly served the agricultural industry. (It should not be confused with the well-known children's and school textbook publisher, Houghton Mifflin). Printing costs were met by donations to the FTE, whose members were told in a December 1988 fundraising letter that donors would receive an enameled box with a panda on the lid as a gift. The box would "become a pleasant reminder to pray for our work," as Buell put it. ^[8]

Following the book's publication in 1989, the FTE embarked on a lengthy campaign to get the book into use in schools across the United States. Previous creationist efforts to dilute or overturn the teaching of evolutionary theory had relied largely on a "top-down" approach of pro-creationist legislators passing laws to regulate science education in schools. However, these had repeatedly failed to survive court challenges. The FTE took a "bottom-up" approach instead, mobilizing local Christian conservative groups to push school boards and individual teachers to adopt the book and also to get themselves elected to school boards and local educational committees. Buell told supporters:

“

Biology teachers are generally easy to contact, available for a meeting on short notice, and receptive. If you would like to be a part of this 'quiet army,' please let us know right away." Those choosing not to enlist "may wish to support those who do by their prayers.[8]

”

The FTE provided publicity materials to its supporters to assist them in pitching the book. These included a video of testimonials by pro-ID scientists and a promotional script, including "lines to take" on contentious issues. For instance, on the controversial issue of ID's perceived overlap with religion, the FTE's suggested response read:

“

I agree that personal beliefs should not be taught in science classrooms, but intelligent design is not a personal belief; it is accepted science, a view that is held by many highly qualified scientists. [8]

”

The FTE was aided in this effort by "traditional" creationist organizations such as the Institute for Creation Research, which sells Of Pandas and People through its own online shop and catalogue. The book was explicitly marketed by retailers as a creationist work; in the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, donated copies of the book were accompanied by a catalog which listed Pandas under "creation science".^[13]

[edit] Controversies

The FTE's activist approach has produced heated controversies in several US states as Christian conservatives and school boards sought to adopt Of Pandas and People in public schools, against the opposition of mainstream scientists, educators and civil liberties organizations. This has caused several notable controversies, culminating in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case in Pennsylvania in which the contents and antecedents of the book came under unprecedented scrutiny.

[edit] 1989 - 1993

In Alabama, 11,800 people signed a petition which was presented to Alabama's school textbook committee, endorsing intelligent design and urging the adoption of Of Pandas and People as a class textbook.^[8] In January 1990 the book was withdrawn from consideration by its publishers, the Haughton Publishing Co., who said that they "backed off because they weren't given [the] chance to defend [the] book."^[14]

By 1990 a public campaign was mounted in Idaho to urge the state school board to adopt Of Pandas and People. However, the book was rejected by the board.

In March 1990, the school board in Pinellas County, Florida rejected an appeal by a retired minister "to adopt the textbook Of Pandas and People that would offer a creationist's view."^[15]

In January 1993, right-wing members of the school board of Vista, California sought to include Of Pandas and People in the school science curriculum. A teachers' committee voted unanimously to reject the book saying it lacked scientific merit.^[16] The board eventually backed away from plans to require creation science to be taught in science classes.^[17]

[edit] 1994 - 1998

In September 1994, residents of Louisville, Ohio voted 121-2 to urge the local school board to adopt Of Pandas and People.^[8] Creationism had been taught openly in district schools until a lawsuit forced a change of policy in 1993; in the wake of the decision, the district was given 150 copies of the book.^[18]

In October, school officials in St. Lucie County, Florida distributed copies of the book to every high school and one middle school in the county to be reviewed by teachers and principals for use as a possible supplement for science classes. The response from teachers was negative but county school officials still planned to distribute the books to school libraries so teachers and students could use it as a resource. According to the local Civic, Business and Ministry Coalition, copies of the book were purchased by the Coalition from the Institute for Creation Research in San Diego, California and were sent to school administrators on the grounds that it was "a good, science-based text appropriate for school children." The Coalition was reported to have met administrators on several occasions to promote creation science. However, the county school board did not find out about the matter until January 1995.^[19]

The Wall Street Journal reported in November that according to the Foundation for Thought and Ethics, 22,500 copies of the book had been printed and teachers and curriculum buyers in 48 states had bought it. Fifteen school districts had ordered quantities large enough to indicate classroom use, but had not been identified "for fear of embroiling them in controversy." ^[8]

In January 1995, conservative members of the Plano, Texas school trust proposed to adopt Of Pandas and People as a supplement to the existing curriculum course materials.^[20] The district school board unanimously voted to bar the book's acquisition following an outcry from local residents, many of whom attended the board's meeting wearing buttons with a red "X" over a panda.^[21] Two of the proponents of the book subsequently lost their seats on the Plano school board.^[22]

In a 1996 Time magazine article it was reported that "school boards in Washington State and Ohio" were considering whether to adopt Of Pandas and People as a school textbook.^[23]

In April 1997, the school board of Chesapeake, Virginia purchased copies of the book for the libraries of each of the district's 15 high schools and middle schools. The acquisition was made on the recommendation of School Superintendent W. Randolph Nichols, but the board stated that the book was intended for use "as a resource book, not as a science book" and that it was not endorsing creationism.^[24]

[edit] 1999 - 2003

In June 1999, the school district in Burlington, Washington approved a local science teacher's proposal to use extracts from Of Pandas and People in the classroom "so long as he balances it with enough support for teachings on evolution which he always included in his courses but about which he says he has doubts - especially in terms of the origin of the human race." The decision followed an earlier demand by the American Civil Liberties Union, that the teacher, Roger DeHart, should cease his years-long practice of teaching intelligent design in his classes. He stated that he needed to counterbalance the inclusion of information that was "at best wrong and at worst fraudulent" in the standard pro-evolution textbooks used in Burlington schools.^[25]

Another attempt to introduce Of Pandas and People into Idaho schools was reported to have been rejected by the state textbook committee.^[26]

In March 2000, the science curriculum director of Kanawha County, West Virginia school district selected Of Pandas and People as a textbook "that presents Darwin's Theory of Evolution as theory, not fact" following pressure from the local community and teachers. A committee of science teachers unanimously voted to purchase copies of the book, but ultimately decided to abandon the idea for fear of litigation. A Christian conservative legal group, the Thomas More Law Center, offered to represent the county for free if any litigation arose but its offer was rejected.^[27] A proposal to buy the book for school libraries was eventually rejected by the school board, though a conservative member of the board pledged to pay for at least 14 copies out of her own pocket.^[28]

In Pratt, Kansas, the local school board voted to remove any mention of macroevolution, the age of the Earth, and the origin of the Universe from science curriculum, but rejected a bid to adopt Of Pandas and People for educational purposes.

[edit] 2004 - 2005: Dover, Pennsylvania

Main article: Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

Of Pandas and People became the focus of a litigation and controversy in Dover, Pennsylvania in 2004 after the Christian conservative–dominated Dover Area School Board endorsed it as a reference book. Perhaps inevitably, the ensuing court case was dubbed the "Panda Trial" by the media in an allusion to the famous "Monkey Trial" of 1925.^[29]

Although the board did not actually purchase the book, 50 copies were donated to the district by an anonymous party. It was revealed in court that a school board member asked his church for donations for the purchase of those books ^[30] though that board member had denied all knowledge of the source of donation in an earlier deposition.^[31] Amid an international controversy, the board also became the first in the US to promote the teaching of ID in the classroom, sparking a lawsuit, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, by the American Civil Liberties Union and other plaintiffs.

The FTE became involved in the Dover controversy when it became clear that Of Pandas and People would be a major focus of litigation. The foundation filed a motion to join the defending side in June 2005, arguing that a finding that intelligent design was religiously motivated could destroy the FTE's ability to sell its books to school districts. Were the motion granted, the FTE would have become a co-defendant with the Dover Area School Board, and able to bring its own lawyers and expert witnesses to the case. FTE's president Jon Buell implied that if allowed to intervene, FTE would bring ID advocates William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer as expert witnesses.

In his decision on the motion, Judge John E. Jones III ruled that FTE was not entitled to intervene in the case because its motion to intervene was not timely, describing FTE's excuses for not trying to become involved earlier as "both unavailing and disingenuous." Judge Jones also held that FTE failed to demonstrate that it has "a significantly protectable interest in the litigation warranting intervention as a party" and that its interests will not be adequately represented by the defendants.

In November 2005 eight of the nine member Dover school board were voted out and replaced with candidates who oppose the previous board's decision to introduce intelligent design and lay doubts on evolution.

On December 20, 2005, the US District Court ruled that intelligent design is not science and is essentially religious in nature and the board's requirement endorsing intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in science classes unconstitutional on the grounds that its inclusion violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The judge in the Dover trial specifically referred to Pandas in his ruling, saying:

“

As Plaintiffs meticulously and effectively presented to the Court, Pandas went through many drafts, several of which were completed prior to and some after the Supreme Court's decision in Edwards, which held that the Constitution forbids teaching creationism as science. By comparing the pre and post Edwards drafts of Pandas, three astonishing points emerge: (1) the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of ID; (2) cognates of the word creation (creationism and creationist), which appeared approximately 150 times were deliberately and systematically replaced with the phrase ID; and (3) the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes in Edwards. This word substitution is telling, significant, and reveals that a purposeful change of words was effected without any corresponding change in content ...."[32]

”

The newly elected board unanimously rescinded the policy on January 3, 2006.

[edit] Campaign to declare Of Pandas and People the "Banned Book of the Year"

In September 2006, John West, a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute began a campaign to have the American Library Association declare the book the "Banned Book of the Year",^[33] but this was dismissed by Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Deputy Director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom who does not consider the book banned.^[34]

[edit] References

[edit] See also

• The Design of Life (third edition of Of Pandas and People)

[edit] External links

[edit] Pro-intelligent design/creationism

• Evolution as Alchemy by William Dembski

• A Report on the ASA Conference Debate on Pandas and People Textbook by Paul Nelson, Access Research Network.

[edit] Pro-science

• The Elusive Scientific Basis of Intelligent Design Theory, by George W. Gilchrist, National Center for Science Education
• Of Pandas and People: Resources from the National Center for Science Education
• The Foundation for Thought and Ethics NCSE Reports, 10(4) (July-August 1990), pp. 18-19.
• Of Pandas and People: A Brief Critique by Kenneth R. Miller
• A Reader's Guide to Of Pandas and People by Richard P. Aulie, National Association of Biology Teachers.
• 1995 annual meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation
• The Panda's Thumb, an article which explains the significance of panda evolution in the debate.
• Fundamentalists Launch Bogus "Supplemental Text" by William J. Bennetta, The Textbook League
• A video of Ken Miller's lecture on Intelligent Design

[edit] Media

• Textbook publisher wants to join lawsuit: Says company is not a religious organization The York Dispatch, York (PA), July 15, 2005