User talk:Orsoni
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Orsoni, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- stillnotelf is invisible 22:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] {{helpme}}
Please use the helpme tag by placing it on your talk page, followed by the question that needs answering. Wherever it is that you have it now, we can't find it. -- ∞Dbroadwell 13:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Categorization
Adding "Motorcycle manufacturers" to articles which are already in a subcategory of that is not constructive. I've undone a couple of these but you know which ones you've done and which therefore need attention. GraemeLeggett 13:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Franco Uncini
Ciao! I reverted your edit on Franco Uncini as the format for biographies should be: "Attilio Stefano Funel (born on July 7, 1975) is an Italian unlucky engineer and writer. He was born in Rome etc.". Check Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Good work! --Attilios 13:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- The convention is that, if Italian, Poland is specified, the birthplace is automatically in Italy, etc. The use of hyperlinks allows Wikipedia to remove redundant specifications which are present in other Encyclopedias. Bye! --Attilios 13:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] John Surtees
Hi. Sorry for going a bit overboard. Thanks for taking an interest. Pyrope 09:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I reckon the case is one of personality. F1 types (and if I am honest I'm probably more a sports car racing kinda guy) are stats obsessives, and aren't so into the biographical details. I mainly got into editing F1 biographies as I was annoyed that so many great sports car drivers (of which JS was one) didn't have any mention of this in their bio pages. Pyrope 12:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Titles of headers
Ciao! Thanks for your additions. Only a note: title of headers must be not in capitals (i.e.: Motorcycle Grand Prix results, and not Results). See WP:Style for further info. Bye and good work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Attilios (talk • contribs).
[edit] Grand Prix motorcycle racing seasons
Thanks for creating articles for many of these seasons. Very good work. Prolog 20:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Very good work? Thats an understatement your work is absolutely amazing!!! I personally asked user:readro and you I think that forty years of motorcycle racing was missinng from wikipedia and could you do it and I find in only a week or two it is practically done. Wow. Terrific stuff. I bow my Ernst Stavro Blofeld bald head done to you . Well done! I will be awarding you a barnstar. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| This is awarded to Orsoni for his important and extensive work in providing the history of nearly forty years of motorcycle racing. Excellent work well done. I am proud of you Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) |
- I removed the GP motorcycle category from Hockenheimring. There is no such race here.--NSX-Racer 15:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Another compliment to you for the immense and impressive amount of work you did putting together the MotoGP seasons. I really wonder how you did it, though -- All manual entry? Scanning with text recognition? A little help from other web pages? A hint of an answer would be appreciated, but regardless, you've done a great job.--Uli Kunkel 22:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I entered them manually :) My job means I'm stuck in one place with many hours to fill.
- You've sure put those hours to good use. On behalf of many MotoGP fans, thanks.--Uli Kunkel 17:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CCM Armstrong Rotax
If u didn't put the CCM Armstrong request in To-do list, my error, but if correct... Have added a bit to CCM, SWM, and added both to Rotax engine users list. The one thing that is unclear is the relationship between CCM and Armstrong. In my "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Motorcycling" it says that "CCM became part of the Armstrong group in 1980", but Clews does not mention any of this on his CCM site history, and haven't found any other reference to date. The "MT-500" went through a few manufacturers in its life. Seasalt 11:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Have since spotted a brochure jpg on cybermotorcycles Armstrong of a CCM made by Armstrong. http://www.cybermotorcycle.com/gallery/armstrong/Armstrong%20CCM%20560MX%20c1984%20Brochure.htm My guess is Armstrong took over CCM in 1980. Clews is probably glossing over the historical details a bit. You are investigating the racers... good luck. Seasalt 12:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Came across an article in Classic Racer magazine on the North West 200 which mentions Armstrong buying Cotton, and taking over Rotax racer production. I have reproduced the NW 200 article, in case it is of any use. Seasalt 13:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barry Sheene
Hi Orsoni, your info box has added some odd random text to the very top of the Barry Sheene article. I didn't want to revert it because I like the infobox, but you might want to play with the code a bit. kju 00:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Map-opatija.pdf
Thanks for uploading Image:Map-opatija.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unblock reviewed
((unblock-auto|1=198.36.32.21|2=repeated vandalism to various articles|3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me))
- This block has been converted to anon-only; you should now be able to edit after logging in. The edits which led to this IP address being block are: [1] [2] in the event you wish to follow up with your internet service provider. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 13:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] British
Thanks for changing those "English" to "British", they had escaped me. Seasalt 14:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adolf Weil
Please use the move function, instead of copy-and-paste, when renaming a page. This avoids splitting the page history in several places. -- ReyBrujo 19:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry if I did anything wrong. I didn't know about the move function. Thanks for letting me know!Orsoni 02:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Infoboxes
Please stop using {{subst…}} when adding infoboxes to articles as you have done for various motorcyclists: it's leaving an awful mess in the articles particularly since you have not supplied all the parameters (such as images). As you can see here, templates like these which have complex code to allow for optional parameters should not be substituted. Could you please either revisit those articles and replace the substituted text with the original infobox or at least make a note on the talk-page of which infobox you used so somebody else can tidy them up? If you do not know how to do this, feel free to drop me a line and I will endeavour to help you. TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 12:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I was talking about articles like Graeme Crosby where you have obviously used
{{subst:infobox…}}, but it's not obvious without some tedious digging which infobox you used. It would be much more helpful if you left the "subst:" out: then the infobox would still be there and updates to the infobox template would be reflected in the article; it would also be much easier for people to fill in information which might have been missing. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 19:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
