Talk:Page Three girl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Lucy Pinder 2 NPOV 3 Removal of image 4 Image 5 Simple request 6 Whoa

[edit] Lucy Pinder

Removed her from list of Page 3 girls - If a "Page 3 girl" is defined as someone who appears in the Sun Newspaper - Lucy Pinder is not, according to her website, she had a contract with the Daily Star - Therefore, I doubt she has ever appeared in the Sun on Page 3. --Rrose Selavy 14:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Would someone be so kind as to institute a policy of posting a daily "Wikipedia Page 3 Girl" and "Wikipedia Page 3 Boy" for our viewing entertainment? -º¡º

OK, which is Page 3 of Wikipedia? - Lee M 16:20, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Erm, wouldn't 3 be a good guess? :p --Kiand 00:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm still waiting.... ;p Mathmo 19:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Start a new page. It is a great idea.

[edit] NPOV

I've removed the NPOV tag from this article for the time being as (a) no-one's put a justification for it here (b) the article is well balanced as far as I can see. Smallbone10 23:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of image

I removed the image Image:Keeley.jpg because in my opinion it doesn't add anything useful to the article. Apparently some others disagree. I'd like to discuss this matter here, so if you agree or otherwise please say so. chowells 15:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I agree with chowells. If an image that does add something useful can be found, I'm all for it. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-10-23 T 16:03:07 Z

A photograph of the paper opened on the page would be good. I'll let someone else buy the Sun and take the photo :p chowells 00:06, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Probably wouldn't have removed it myself based on what I saw, however....... although there is no way I'd add it back in after somebody has removed it. I would do that if only there was more evidence of it being a page3 girl. Such as the actual newspaper around it??? Although the current one I guess is good from a historical point of view? Mathmo 19:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I'd like a warning that the page contains nudity. Personally, I don't object, but pulling up this page in North American offices could get you fired. --Navstar 23:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

By the time someone would see the warning, they would already be on the page. And what are they doing looking up this kind of stuff on company time, anyway? Wahkeenah 23:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a lot of Americans would know what a Page Three girl is. You never know where a Wikilink will take you! :) --Navstar 15:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image

The current image (Image:Rahn240.jpg)) doesn't look anything like a modern "Page 3", in style or in content, and as such is more than a little misleading. Assuming it doesn't represent a copyright problem, wouldn't a photo of the paper be better? PeteVerdon 17:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Have you no sense of history?! Pcb21 Pete 19:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Simple request

I'd like to request we get a few more pictures on this page. I don't think they'll improve the article, I just want to see some naked birds. More Pictures.--Crestville 00:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

An extra picture or two could be helpful, because certainly the current picture is nothing like modern page 3 girls. Perhaps there is a famous example whcih could be here as well? Mathmo 02:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

you sexy bitch

[edit] Whoa

How the hell can there be nudity in a newspaper... that's crazy.

• I'm not being racist, just curious - is the above comment by an American? I seem to come across many people on Wikipedia who find topless pictures (not even full-on nudity) deeply shocking and offensive, and 9/10 times they are american. Is nudity seen as much more taboo in America or something? Saccerzd 21:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

--I know--- tell me about it, I despise the Sun and all tabloids like it. Nothing but cheap and trashy and a totally biased paper.

Crap paper, but I'd buy it for page 3. God bless this country.--Crestville 19:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)