Talk:Pink Floyd discography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Recent revision of pictures?
What happened here? this article was very nice and now ... not so much. This used to be an excellent discography? I saw that they were removed by A Man In Black...what was the problem? many discographys have this identical layout. Were the images too big? I saw you cited rule #8, which seemed totally satisfied, they contributed greatly and were not merely decorative. All those same images were used in the actual album pages too. I am confused. and as for rule #3...If the image sized were bumpped down could they stay (even though they were not all that big to start with, by no means big enough to be used for piracy)? The copy rights under all of these images allow for this exact thing do they not? I feel a revert is in order...Ostrolphant 17:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Singles and EPs
Information about singles and EPs is missing. This should be added.
[edit] Soundtracks
I don't want to mess up the layout, but More and Obscured... belong under 'Studio Albums'; tat's what they are. Andy Mabbett 22:21, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- Yep. --84.142.157.119 12:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
"I don't want to mess up the layout, but More and Obscured... belong under 'Studio Albums'; tat's what they are". I fully agree. Somebody should fix it.
What about albums sold?? i would like to know the approx. amount of albums sold worldwide for each floyd record. i only know very vague figures, like DSOTM selling 40m or something, but this should be added.