Talk:Rachel Marsden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

This page was previously nominated for deletion.

Please see prior discussions before considering re-nomination:

speedy keep, December 26, 2006, see discussion.
speedy keep, March 7, 2006, see discussion.
speedy keep, March 4, 2006, see discussion.

Archive 1, February 27 – March 1, 2006
Archive 2, March 2, 2006 – February 7, 2007

[edit] Marsden's job at Fox

Marsden is panelist on the late-night show Red Eye. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117958651.html?categoryid=14&cs=1&query=red+eye

Alaric the Goth 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure why the Conservatives' offer of a nomination and their subsequent withdrawal of same ins an encyclopedic fact. Alaric the Goth

When a major political party seeks out a nationally-known journalist as a candidate, it's notable. CJCurrie 23:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

If the Communists claim to scout Bob Rae, will we put it in Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alaric the Goth (talk • contribs).

Are the Communists "a major political party"? Or is this just a straw man for you to knock down? AverageGuy 14:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

It's in the same paragraph as her conditional discharge. It can really only be read as something negative and quite gratuitous. Alaric the Goth 23:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I moved the graf after a brief discussion with CJCurrie. The "nomination" fact, for what it's worth, is separated from the court case. If it seems out of place, then, perhaps it does pass the test of being a derogatory "fact" arising from the court case. Alaric the Goth 23:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My edit

Please do not revert my edit without discussion. There is some concern around about this article, including damaging claims made about the subject of the article. Also, we only had a primary source for this particular claim, which is at least borderline OR. Metamagician3000 13:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)