Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lachatdelarue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Lachatdelarue

Editing since July with more than five hundred edits (I'm sure someone will be more specific), and active in the dog breeds Wikiproject. I think she has a good understanding of Wiki policies and would make a good admin. Tuf-Kat 05:05, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

(10/2/0) ending 05:05 11 Nov 2004 0000 (UTC)

• Thank you, I accept the nomination. [[User:Lachatdelarue|Lachatdelarue (talk)]] 15:33, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. Elf | Talk 16:06, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC) Have worked with L. since user joined and have a very favorable opinion, both attitude & technical.
2. Gangleri | talk 19:47, 2004 Nov 4 (UTC) for Lachatdelarue's ongoing work on cat and dog breeds. He will need adminship to find all the (cat, dog ...) articles together and to continue his work.
3. Andre (talk) 21:01, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)
4. Looks good to me. Shane King 03:56, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
5. A good contributor sannse (talk) 10:09, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
6. Yet another prime example of a qualified individual here. -- Grunt   ҈  16:12, 2004 Nov 5 (UTC)
7. Strongly support. TO BLANKFAZE: I believe 1500 edits is enough for adminship, and there is no reason to oppose someone because you aren't familiar with her. --Lst27 (talk) 00:26, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
8. Support. Has a nice username, too :) ugen64 03:49, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
9. Support. Well Blankfaze is an admin, even though I don't know him and he's got less than 2000 edits in the main namespace (assuming the statistics are right). So what? I've heard no complaints about his admin performance. I see no reason to oppose adminship for Lachatdelarue any more than for Blankfaze. Wolfman 23:08, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
10. The user's talk page indicates that she has been very friendly and helpful to other uses and makes valuable maintenance and cleanup contributions. Acegikmo1 23:56, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Doesn't meet my personal standards. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 05:18, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
   • Which of your standards doesn't she meet? -- Schnee 03:00, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
     • The 2,000 edits one, primarily. Also, I'm unfamiliar with her. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 03:37, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
       • How is not knowing her a reason for opposition? JOHN COLLISON [ Ludraman] 17:51, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2. Not enough edits. Passw0rd 22:32, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• 1482 edits as of now. -- Netoholic @ 05:09, 2004 Nov 4 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. I would help with RC Patrol (which I have already been active in) and recently I've been getting more interested in VfD. I enjoy cleanup work.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I am very happy with the work I've done for the cat breeds project, doing major formatting and organizational work, not to mention expanding articles.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?

A. I haven't been in any major conflicts over editing, but if I were I believe I would keep a level-head about it, and resolve it peacably.