Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archives
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Requests for adminship sections | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
edit | watch Active nominations for Administrator and Bureaucrat |
post | watch | archives Bureaucrat noticeboard Discussions related to RfA |
Successful RfAs Unsuccessful RfAs Successful RfBs Unsuccessful RfBs Nomination data |
To nominate an editor |
Administrators Bureaucrats Guide to RfA Admin reading list Admin how-to guide |
| Current admin count: 1,166 | ||||
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Contents |
2003
- Early archives: the first 13 archives are very short (often a single topic); these 13 archives are consolidated here (June 2003 - March 2004)
2004
-
- Archive 4: Newbie questions (January 2004)
- Archive 5: Transferring promotion powers to admins from developers (January 2004)
- Archive 6: Greenmountainboy (January 2004)
- Archive 7: Complaint against tannin (January 24-25, 2004)
- Archive 8: Abuse of de-sysop area (January 30-31, 2004)
- Archive 9: Discussion on January 31, 2004 about how to deal with misuse of admin privileges
- Archive 10: Recent discussion archived in advance (February 2004)
- Archive 11: Policy on Anons and this page (February 9, 2004)
- Archive 12: Discussion on 19-25 February 2004 about who can vote and how bureaucrats should be appointed
- Archive 13: Discussion of what consensus is needed for a request (February-March 2004)
- Archive 14: Polls on making all admins bureaucrats, and on possible minimum requirements for adminship (February-March 2004)
- Archive 15: Discussion of nominators, self-nominations, and nominating procedures (March 2004)
- Archive 16: Possible minimum requirements for voting, discussion and poll about bureaucrats exercising individual judgment in determining consensus (March-April 2004)
- Archive 17: TOC tallies, relative merits of a firm 80% threshold compared to "bureaucrat" judgement, creeping upwards of requirements for support of adminship, possible periodic renewal of adminship, issues regarding specific nominations (March 4-May 20 2004. No discussion May 20-June 1)
- Archive 18: Questions about adminship, Lst27, JediMaster16, this page needs an image...
- Archive 19: Discussion and poll about early removal of nominations, possible timelags between re-nominations (July 2004)
- Archive 20: Sockpuppets and qualifications for voting (August 2004)
- Archive 21: Edit counting, subpages, boilerplate questions and more (September 2004)
- Archive 22: Promotions to bureaucrat (October 2004)
- Archive 23: Adminship standards; de-admining inactive admins; limit on concurrent nominations (October/November 2004)
2005
- Archive 24: Candidate acceptance of nomination; change in mediawiki users; number of bureaucrats (November-December 2004)
- Archive 25: January-April 2005
- Archive 26: May-June 2005
- Archive 27: late June-July 2005 – Weyes, Seth Ilys's revalidatation, bureaucracy reform + poll, rfa reform, removing blank votes, 500th admin, Uncle G + suspension proposal, DrZoidberg, Boothy443, WP:TRI, new template proposal, sockpuppets, vandalism of MarkSweep
- Archive 28: August 2005 – Boothy443, Lucky 6.9, a proposal for bureaucrat reform, doing away with the self-nomination section, an illustration for this page, Boothy443 again, non-admins with high edit counts, inconsistencies in the procedure, premature removal of nominations, changes to the self-nomination guidelines, editcountitis, admins and valid e-mail addresses
- Archive 29: About Bureaucrats
- Archive 30" Gordon Watts's proposals, BD2412's proposal to hand out admin powers piecemeal (rejected)
- Archive 31: Editcountitis, Sam Spade's criticisms, sysop promotions suspended
- Archive 32: minor changes in nominating procedure.
- Archive 33: One-ups-manship in voting, proposed procedure change,
- Archive 34: checkuser, bureaucrats noms
- Archive 35: longer answers to questions, delisting and closing of Private Butcher RfA, nominees' desire for doing admin chores, archive archive list, wording of /nominate subpage, delist when questions unanswered, Stevertigo RfA, tainted votes, guide to RfA, how many admins are needed
- Archive 36: Sockpuppets, req for rollback
- Archive 37: Tony1's Rfa
- Archive 38: Dual nominations, Silsor de-adminship request, multiple discussions on improving RfA, policies on removing RfAs
- Archive 39: Chi-Square test, Admin-lite" proposal, RFA reform proposals
- Archive 40: Editcountitis/Agecountitis, RfB discussion, Various notes on voting, RfA growth
- Archive 41: Links vs. transclusion for failing RfAs, Editcountitis/Agecountitis, Some RfA closeout and messups, kate's tool and backup
- Archive 42: Poll on removal of failing RfAs and discussion, Luigi30's RfA, Hamster Sandwich RfA, antecedent checking
- Archive 43: 750 admins; improper dates
2006
- Archive 44: Various proposals on RfA reform, edit summary usage as a criteria, discussion on problem admins & query on standards, Wikipedia riots
- Archive 45: Poll on b-crat noms, new edit history tool, suffrage, b-crat closings, concerns about votes from one user, snowball clause debate, new RfA reform idea
- Archive 46: Requests for input on RfA reform, admin accountability poll, other ideas about RfA reform, standards for admins, a debated non-promotion, a symmetrical thread about CSCWEM
- Archive 47: More RfA reform ideas, RfA vandalism, Publicizing an RfA, disputed RfA, RfA suspension and debate, some desysoppings
- Archive 48: Revert of addition, Deleting aborted RFA attempts
- Archive 49: RfA reform, AzaToth RfA, CSCWEM RfA
- Archive 50: Francs2000 resigns, Essjay's RfB, number of bureaucrats.
- Archive 51: What to call admins, Masssiveego's votes, sockpuppetry, editcountitis.
- Archive 52: Jwrosenzweig's decision, BradPatrick, bureaucrats.
- Archive 53: RfA statistical trends, too many optional questions?
- Archive 54: HolyRomanEmperor's 3rd RfA, poll on semiprotecting RfA.
- Archive 55: Multiple nominators, pre-acceptance votes, various RfA reform ideas
- Archive 56: reasons for pileons, RfA candidate's song, where to announce invited votes, votes after deadline
- Archive 57: Apprentice/journeyman admins proposal, admin renewal, RfA analysis tool, working with comments, consensus discussion, removing sockpuppets after close, IP votes.
- Archive 58: Various ideas on administrator review, some irregularities on current RfAs, voting icons, early closal guideline proposal, rfa closing templates, duplicate voter reporting bot.
- Archive 59: Publicizing RfAs, minor changes in process, failing RfAs.
- Archive 60: Formatting of RfAs, whether RfA is a vote, "how to become an admin ASAP" essay, RfA standards dropping?, rearranging / expanding question area of nominations, self noms.
- Archive 61: More issues regarding the RfA process, changes to the nomination page, HolyRomanEmperor's mysterious disappearance and alleged death (late June 2006 - early July 2006).
- Archive 62: Editing front matter, RfA process.
- Archive 63: 75% threshold standard and poll.
- Archive 64: Discussion of standards, Sean Black RfA, RfA formats.
- Archive 65: Harsher side of RfA, jury voting, types of potential admins, July 2006 RfA in review
- Archive 66: Alternate users, Young administrator candidates, Image:Rouge-Admin.png, Checkuser?
- Archive 67: Alternate accounts, clutter, Essjay's tool
- Archive 68: 1000 admins, Carnildo RfA result lengthy discussion, August 2006 RfA in review, multiple ideas for RfA reform, suggestion for page on other language RfA standards.
- Archive 69: A number of discussions related to RfA reform. Some charts.
- Archive 70: Sept./Oct. 2006 – Several discussions on alternative formats for RfA: how to better format RfA as a vote, AzaToth experimental RfA format, listing RfAs on a subpage. Discussion of point when only 2 RfAs were active.
- Archive 71: More discussion on RfA reform. Anonymous voting.
- Archive 72: straw poll on need for reform, RfA as RfC, other reform ideas
- Archive 73: A number of takes on admin reform, increasing vandalism, questions asked in RfA, change in RfA procedure.
- Archive 74: Successful nominees, limit RFAs, standards
- Archive 75: Suggested changes to RfA templates, voting icons, optional questions, transferable experience
- Archive 76: More about transferable skills, RFA standards, questions, canvassing, bureaucrats
2007
- Archive 77: January 2007 – moral supports, edit counts, bureaucrats, arguing with opposes
- Archive 78: January 2007 - Anons asking questions, new RFB template
- Archive 79: Ryulong promotion, RfA reform (January 2007)
- Archive 80: Poll to have two bureaucrats on controversial decisions, consensus discussions, need for admins, have 70% be threshold for promotion (27 January 2007 - 3 February 2007)
- Archive 81: Provisional adminship, basis of votes, analysis of admin activity, need for more admins, finding qualified candidates, help needed in other areas (2 February 2007 - 13 February 2007)
- Archive 82: Arguments to avoid, RfA in other Wikipedias, adminship and editing, 2006 year in review, why nothing gets done on RfA reform, adminship survey, various records (9 February 2007 - 22 February 2007)
- Archive 83: Policy on non-transcluded RfAs, numbering subsequent RfAs, early removal of RfAs and WP:SNOW, how to be an admin (21 February 2007 - 26 February 2007)
- Archive 84: Discussions on bureaucrats (26 February 2007 - 9 March 2007)
- Archive 85: Deadmanship proposal, German RFA solution (10 March - 14 March)
- Archive 86: RFA-related questions and April Fools' Day (16 March - 2 April)
