User talk:RingtailedFox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
RingtailedFox's Talk Page (EN Wikipedia)
|
|
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Note: Please only use Special:Emailuser/RingtailedFox if you think that you have been wrongly blocked. If you have not been blocked, please do not use that. email me at slycooper1986@yahoo.ca, or this talk page instead.
Archives |
---|
The Complete Archives – all discussions (Note: this page is very large) |
Archive 1: NOV 04, 2005 – AUG 06, 2006 |
|
[edit] {{NB Expressways}} and other templates
After your edits, {{NB Expressways}}, {{NS 100 Hwys}}, {{Quebec Autoroutes}} don't display properly when collapsed (hit the hide button, or check out List of Canadian highways by province to see how it's rendered in an article). Could you please fix that. Thanks. --Qyd 15:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that an extra break doesn't solve anything: the big text 'Expressways and Freeways still leaks out of the navbox when it's collapsed. It's probably beacause the said text, along with the acompaning html tags, are placed outside the NavContent div. Well, that navbox looks like a christmas tree anyway, with all the images within tables within tables within div's within html tags, etc... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qyd (talk • contribs).
- The big titles were showing because they were inside NavHead, and RingtailedFox has been moving them back to NavContent, which is the div that gets hidden. If you are interested, Qyd, I've made some comments about these templates on my talk page. –Pomte 04:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Network logos in infobox
I've reverted your addition of the NBC and NBC Weather Plus logos to the infobox for WDIV-TV. The reason I did so is that I'm concerned it may violate our eighth fair use criterion; I don't think the logos (which are fair use) contribute much to the article. You may wish to look at the WP:FLAG essay as well; adding network logos to infoboxes in general appears to be fairly related to overuse of flags in articles. I just wanted to make you aware of this for future reference. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, this also concerns WJBK and possibly others as well. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's quite all right. It's often easy to assume from seeing other articles what seems to be an acceptable practice, even if it doesn't quite mesh with policies. I can't really blame you on this one. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CHICOTW - AT&T Corporate Center past editor
|
||
In the past you have edited AT&T Corporate Center. This week it has been selected as the WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week a Chicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
|
||
|
TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Categories
Just a reminder to please not apply duplicate categorization to articles. If Ruthven, Ontario can be filed in Category:Communities in Essex County, Ontario, then it doesn't also go into Category:Essex County, Ontario at the same time; if Huron Church Road can be filed in Category:Streets in Windsor, Ontario, then it doesn't also go into Category:Windsor, Ontario, Category:Essex County, Ontario or Category:Roads in Ontario. We only apply the most specific appropriate category from any given tree, not every category. Bearcat 01:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)