Talk:Shahawar Matin Siraj
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Shahawar Matin Siraj is part of the Terrorism and counter-terrorism WikiProject, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of terrorism and counter-terrorism. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Contents |
[edit] Wikify the article
I wrote the entire article myself and now I need someone with an eye for detail to wikify it. I feel that it is very neutral, but neutrality issues will probably result and they can be resolved here at the discussion page.--Screwball23 talk 00:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article's Name
I don't know if i should change the article's name to 2004 NYC Attempted subway bomb or Shahawar Matin Siraj v. US (2004). if anyone knows how the voting procedure on an article's name is run, please contact me.--Screwball23 talk 19:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] /* Verdict */ Martin Stolar; no Mike.
/* Verdict */ Martin Stolar; no Mike.
Thank You.
[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 16:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
I cited references from NYC newspapers and they were deleted for no good reason. They were adequate sources and cited details that appear on the article. Unfortunately, another editor chose to remove them because they were not online and not easily accessible to them.--Screwball23 talk 19:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Other editors have no way to tell if those references are correct because you did not provide URLs. Linkable references are not hard to find. KazakhPol 19:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're telling me nobody reads papers anymore? What does that mean about the other editors? They're just piling junk from the internet and collaborate to polish it up until whatever's on Wikipedia looks right to the most number of people? Not every fact on wikipedia cites a URL--Give me a break. --Screwball23 talk 19:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am saying that if the references you cited are valid then you should have no trouble finding online equivalents. I, theoretically, should not have trouble finding references for the content on this article, if the information is valid. I will try to reference it now. KazakhPol 19:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're telling me nobody reads papers anymore? What does that mean about the other editors? They're just piling junk from the internet and collaborate to polish it up until whatever's on Wikipedia looks right to the most number of people? Not every fact on wikipedia cites a URL--Give me a break. --Screwball23 talk 19:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
