Talk:Slurm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page used to redirect to Futurama. The problem was that the futurama article barely mentions slurm at all. As the Futurama article is already long enough, (if not too long) I started a new page. I will add pics and some more content soon, that is if no-one beats me to it. --Apyule 07:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Does this really warrant its own article?
In my opinion, yes. Santtus 11:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- It should be noted that a List of Futurama products exists. IMO, if it is decided this does not merit an article, the ideal would be to merge it with List of Futurama products rather than Futurama or worse, deleting it. That said, I have no opinion on whether it should be kept or merged in that way. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 05:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, shame on me. List of Futurama products would actually be a much better place to put it into. Santtus 10:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Origins
I removed the following two paragraphs from the "Origins" section of the article.
- The last season of Star Trek: Deep Space 9, corresponding to the season previous to the one Fry and the Slurm Factory aired on, featured an episode centered on a Ferengi businessman who owned "Slug-O-Cola," a drink that, while only inferred and referenced to, is very similar to Slurm.
- Also, the name "Slurm" may be a pun on the word Sperm.
I see no substance in either of these claims. --Swift 10:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Non-Futurama meanings
I'm tempted to remove the reference to the Linux utility, SLURM. If it has a place in Wikipedia, shouldn't it be on a seperate page or on one that is on such tools (as opposed to a page on fictional soft drinks)? --Swift 10:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- And someone put it back in. *sigh* As a compromise I put a mention of the utility at the top in a disambiguation like way, pointing to a non-existant page on the utility. If it deserves any more, it should have it's own page. Until someone uses this talk page to iron things out I'll keep boldly reverting. --Swift 08:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Logo
The logo heading this page has terrible colours. They're not even remotely close to the orignal logos. I've offered elsewhere, and been denied. I agree that Wikipedia isn't as in-depth as a Futurama-centric Wiki is and that logos aren't entirely necessary. However, in this case, I think this one could stand to be replaced. Please see the logos I've created here, and let me know if I should upload one of them to replace the current one. Thanks. Buddy13 19:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Well, nobody said anything. So I be'd bold and did it. Hope nobody objects. Buddy13 20:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, was away that week you posted the comment and simply didn't notice it after I got back. Logos look great. Thanks! --Swift 00:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
Why do I see "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name," even though there was no note of it in the history, and nothing in the deletion log? --FlyingPenguins 19:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- I've been getting that as well today. Try the purge link in that infobox. --Swift 20:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, it works now. This appears on other parts of Wikipedia too, is this a problem with the site? --FlyingPenguins 01:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not sure, but it hasn't happened to me for a while. --Swift 02:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, it works now. This appears on other parts of Wikipedia too, is this a problem with the site? --FlyingPenguins 01:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)