User talk:Steve3849
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Navigation User_talk:Steve3849
Talk Page | Archives: 01
[edit] Apologies
My apologies for the mistaken edit. But please realize that ANY edit made non-logged in will simply be seen askew no matter what.
As for this comment you made in your note to me: "I'm thinking your work is secondary to your Bot (or copy/pasted) warnings as your warning to me quoted above was to "please... not add" info." Please do not make comments on my job or work or work I do on Wiki during the time I have to kill. It's a clear personal comment that flies in the face of WP:CIV.
Best of wishes editing. --BaseballDetective 04:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Keep on jazzing! --05:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Article About Musician Linked by The "Wars" Bot
User:AlexNewArtBot is a bot that intended to improve communication within Wikipedians. It reads the new articles and sees if they match some rules. If the rules are matched the bot puts the article into a relevant list e.g. User:AlexNewArtBot/LiteratureSearchResult. The people who contribute to the rules might be interested why such a such new article was or was not put to the list. That is why the bot keeps "logs" showing work of its mind. In particular it considered [[James Singleton (musician)]] to be included in a number of lists and did not included into any. It was probably a right decision.
As you could notice we do not have any music-related feeds generated by the bot yet. I think it should be fixed at some times. If people interesting in rap/classic/jazz whatever would have an access to the list of the new articles related to their subject then there will be good chances of a peer review catching incorrect facts, libels, vanity etc. If you are interested in producing such rules, you are welcome.
Obviously then I was talking about the pathetic lists of "bad" (possible vanity or attack pages) and "good" (candidates for WP:DYK) articles I was talking about the lists not the articles itself. The bot is stupid and does not evaluate the articles it would put a nicely formatted crap into the "good articles" list and an article about a rapper having obscenities (because they were the titles of the songs) into the bad list. I did not expected misunderstanding and not sure how to fix it. Alex Bakharev 23:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
