Talk:Strategic Conquest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Cleanup
I've done some cleanup, but it's going to need more. First, this page is about SC, not every vaguely SC-like game. This is not a free advertising medium - if your game is notable enough to be worth mentioning in WP, it's worth its own article; don't try to sneak it in here via external link. Second, we don't link to warez sites, in this case especially sleazy since Delta Tao is still selling the game. Thirdly, this page needs to stick to facts, not personal ideas about strategy. If a strategy is known to be good, quote Delta Tao or some other website. It's OK to suggest possible strategies by making obvious deductions from the rules ("capturing port cities prevents ship production"), but that's about it. Stan 16:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Added Web-based Version to References
It is absolutely relevant to mention the evolution of this game, and where people might be able to find a modern day version. According to your logic, "Empire" shouldn't be mentioned either. If you do any research into this game, you will see that Strategic Domination IS a web-based version of Strategic Conquest. I have played Strategic Conquest since it first came out for the Mac. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benar20 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
- Then make an article for it and connect to it that way. WP is not a link farm; see Wikipedia:External links for details. Stan 22:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)