User talk:Unisouth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Talk archives
This page gets archived every 6 months.
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:This page your viewing 2.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:This page your viewing 2.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 03:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
There a couple of problems with you putting that image on Website and Web page:
- As the Website article explains, a web site is a collection of web pages. The picture you put up was a screenshot of a single web page.
- The picture is fair use because it depicts the copyrighted AOL software. You replaced the image of the free Firefox browser on Web page with a picture of copyrighted AOL software. This violates fair use criteria number 1, namely "No free equivalent is available or could be created".
I have reverted your edits. —Remember the dot (t) 20:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject ELCB
Futher to the topic you brought up on my talk page Yes, I think it would be quite aggod idea, with the current state of the articles. I recently changed one article. One had the fact that the OmniTown was not a chassis, while the OmniTown article said it was! However, I have no idea how to start a Wikiproject, so if we were to create one, you would have to start it! -- Arriva436 19:41, 24th January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] London Underground Rolling Stock pages - standardization
A few months ago you asked me to standardize the pages on the various London Underground rolling stocks. This has been a slow process as I tried to find a way that would fit all types, past, present, and future. However no where on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_London_Transport page does it give standardization information for these pages. This is something that needs to addressed. Ideas? I should mention that recently someone added infoboxes to the current stock. I have spoken to the individual and hope to have something worked out that could be applied to all pages, but I still feel that the standardization of these pages needs to be sorted and this needs to listed on the main page.Jsp3970 15:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I will see what I can do to standardize them. As for "In rolling stock articles, a interior and exterior image is compulsory." this may be a little hard for some of the earlier stock. For the A, or B stock I have never seen an interior shot at all! Jsp3970 16:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FSU Metro Project
I remember several months ago I asked you to help me start it off, well now it needs to go through the voting...so please support us here--Kuban Cossack 14:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject ELCB update
See here -- Arriva 436 19:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Big coke.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Big coke.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] BBC One image
Please don't change the BBC One image - it was supplied by the BBC press office, as explained in the image's text. Thanks. ••Briantist•• talk 06:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Big coca-cola.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Big coca-cola.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject ELCB update
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject ELCB.
Arriva 436 21:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Flextech
You created a page above in October for a project which has yet to be created. Please at least propose the project, or I may find myself by the end of the week nominating the page for speedy deletion. John Carter 18:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:WikiProject Flextech
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Flextech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. John Carter 14:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bus Route 381
Hello Unisouth, thanks for the welcome, I am going to write an article for the Travel London Route 381 bus, I'll contact you when it's ready. Cheers SwissRe 15:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've Just completed it, and I am going to Link it now. SwissRe 15:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject ELCB update
See here: Wikipedia:WikiProject ELCB#New Infoboxes
Oh, and User:1B6 who became a member a couple of days ago has been banned indefinately for vandilism. -- Arriva 436 14:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the infobox, but the one on the East Lancs Olympus is still causing a bit of trouble!!! -- Arriva 436 13:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! mattbr 19:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notable bus articles
A lot of bus articles have been made recently that are not notable to be worth keeping. So I made this page to tell people if a route should have an article or not. Feel free to edit it or tell what you think. Unisouth 18:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Articles really should be created on all bus routes, but people should finish one before starting another, otherwise it reduces the overall quality of all of them.
I plan to go through every single one over time, and sign off all those that are complete. See User:web_kai2000/List of all London Buses --sonicKAI 23:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
