Talk:Wallace S. Broecker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] POV removal
On the recent addition by RonCram. Ron, you are adding your own POV to the page... Let me itemize them:
- often cited
- This paper isn't cited often. There are 79 citations to this one - so few that it comes in at page 3 on a Google scholar search for Broeckers papers. (the topmost has 555 citations). His 2006 conference paper "The Great Conveyer" is cited 296 times.
- If MWP was truly global, then the warmer temperatures experienced in the last 30 years may be considered unexceptional.
- Whether or not the MWP was global - has no bearing on your statement that it was warmer - which isn't the current scientific opinion.
- Regarding predictions of future catastrophic global warming
- This one is really bad - "catastrophic" is entirely your own invention. His statement is on mode-changes (or abrupt changes), something that isn't captured in models - from my readings you can equate this with Hansen's "tipping points".
Please try to have an NPOV attitude when writing. --Kim D. Petersen 05:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles of living people | Science and academia work group articles | Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics | Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles | Unknown-priority biography (science and academia) articles | Science and academia work group articles needing infoboxes | Biography articles needing infoboxes | Start-Class biography articles | Start-Class physics articles