Talk:William Hetherington case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Am not sure about this one, I suspect the original contributor could be pushing an agenda (note especially "Given the circumstances, many believe that the conviction was wrongful and that his wife lied." "Many"? Where is the source? "Given the circumstances" needed to be precisely explained)

Also, from a couple of media articles I have seen(but only one that I can actually link to), it looks like "wrongfully convicted" may be a little strong. As far as I can tell, the status of William Hetherington as "wrongfully convicted" is speculative and has not been upheld in a court of law. However I'm not removing it from the "wrongfully convicted" category: I'm prepared to admit there may be significant support for Hetherington - I'll leave it up to someone with more knowledge of the case and public opinion about it. Georgeslegloupier 14:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)