User talk:Wser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome to my talk page. Please feel free to leave any messages, particularly if I have got something wrong! I will reply on your talk page as well as mine. please don't forget to sign (by adding -~~~~ at the end of your comment).
[edit] Hybrid couplers
I noticed that you added the {{stub}} template to the Hybrid coupler article. I view that as an extended redirect to the Power dividers and directional couplers article. A plain redirect wouldn't work, but a definition followed by a link seem sufficient to me.
I would encourage people to expand the Power dividers and directional couplers article rather than the Hybrid coupler article. Would you reconsider the stub template? --Gerry Ashton 14:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- You asked for more information about hybrid couplers. One definition I've seen is a coupler that divides an input equally between two outputs, so one can just read the "Power dividers and directional couplers article" with that definition in mind. There may be fields within electronics where hybrid coupler has a more specific meaning, but I don't know for sure. --Gerry Ashton 19:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fleurier
Hi. You recently added text to Fleurier that said that it was the place in the world with the most Nobel Prize winners. I have added the names of the two persons, but do you have a reference for the claim that this makes Fleurier the place with the most prize winners? I would have thought a large city or a university town such as Cambridge, Massachusetts might be able to claim more. Regards, --BillC 21:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for replying. I don't mean to denigrate Fleurier, but to pick just a single example, Paris was the birthplace of at least three Nobel laureates: Frédéric Joliot-Curie, Henri Moissan and Frédéric Passy, so Fleurier clearly does not hold this record. --BillC 16:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Tres5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tres5.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 13:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Also I guess you are OW? What year? ed g2s • talk 13:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
