User talk:216.205.224.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 216.205.224.10, is registered to 20th Century Fox, and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.

See also User talk:216.205.224.11.

1 Warnings
2 May 19th
3 June 2006
4 Block
5 5th July
6 Your edit to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit
7 Reblock
8 Unblock request

Warnings

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- 20:49, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Please stop inserting commercial links like the real estate site you are putting into the Pasadena, California article. Those links do not belong in Wikipedia. Thanks. -EDM 22:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Jake Zim was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Pilo t|guy 19:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

May 19th

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --E ivind ^t ^@^c 23:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page February on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Saaber 18:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Pegasus1138. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 23:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

June 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Andrew Reynolds, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Liface 21:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to January 23, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 22:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to December 26, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 22:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Joyous! | Talk 20:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Cumulus Robotics, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Scientizzle 21:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism and removing warnings/notes. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.
Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator. Rx StrangeLove 23:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Do not disrupt Wikipedia. Adding a {{hoax}} tag to East Timor is just you violating WP:POINT because you didn't like that your hoax articles were removed. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to East Timor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 18:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Ditto with Benque Viejo del Carmen.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Benque Viejo del Carmen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 18:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Portmanteau on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus (Talk) 22:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

5th July

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Three Laws of Robotics. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Steel 22:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 22:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Reblock

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. -- Infrogmation 01:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 18:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

216.205.224.10 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log)

Unblock request

Request reason: "(This block has gone on for far too long)"

I think you'll find it is the vandalism which has gone on for too long. --pgk^(talk) 20:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

You are permanently banning an entire company's IP because one or two users in the entire company are vandalizing. That seems a tad bit autocratic, and dare I say, unfair to the other 29,998 employees of Twentieth Century Fox. Don't you think?216.205.224.10 17:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

No I don't. Please log in if you wish to edit. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 01:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Now you're just being ridiculous. There are maybe 1 or 2 user vandalizing from this IP range, and 30,000 other freaking innocent users being cut off. This is why people accuse you admins of having become corrupt and fascist -- you make fascist decisions like these every day, and enforce them arbitrarily. 216.205.224.10 17:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. You're welcome to register. I'll make sure this is enabled. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 19:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I've tried to register, and it keeps saying this IP has reached its 6-name limit for the day. I certainly haven't created an account today, and prior to your enabling the creation of accounts at this IP, I don't believe it was possible. Is there any way to reset the counter, or do something? 216.205.224.10 19:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

"You are permanently banning an entire company's IP", the company should take responsibility for the use of their equipment. Here's an idea, why don't you contact your network people, get them to compare there logs to the time of the vandalism, find the idiots responsible and get their manager to do something about their abuse of the companies network facilities. No vandalism = No blocks. --pgk^(talk) 20:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]