User talk:72.178.235.28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikieZach| talk 02:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for repetitive incivility and vandalism for a period of sixty hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 16:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove official notices. It is grounds for having your block extended.--Rosicrucian 01:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

As stated in the template, it is improper to replace a declined block request with another block request.--Rosicrucian 03:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here How to archive a talk page. Thank you. --Brad Beattie (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

DDT/Facebuster

Your arguement does hold some ground However, wrestling terminology isnt always accurate so sometimes these incossistencies occur.. but we list them how they are listed in wrestling and the Pedigree is considered a facebuster even with its DDT qualities --- Paulley

i have looked at your edits and the fact is that though your argument to move the section has ground it was placed there because in wrestling terminology the move is considered a facebuster. These overlaps occasionally happen and in the case of this move depending on how well it is performed (as in if the head stays clinched inbetween the legs or comes loose) places it under two different terms... the fact of the matter is the move is best known as a facebuster and every istance of its use is linked there. There is no just reason to move it to DDT esspecially as another move known as a double underhook DDT already exists. Please dont take offence it just isnt a viable move --- Paulley 01:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

This my last effort to comunicate with you... The idea of the move is obviously controversial. At this point you should have put up a survey on the article's talk page to democratally decide whether or not the move should take place; yet instead you purposely ignored warning and efforts to comunicate with personal attack and constant reverts. That is no way to get your suggestion across and for that reason i doubt you could now convince anyone this move is correct.. your lack of tact and reasoning will only go against you, esspecially if you want something changed like that. Next time try talking it through with editors; use talk pages and the wrestling wikiproject and you might have better chance. --- Paulley 02:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

In the talk page, when posting a message, we request a signature.

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 01:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Last Warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 02:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

DDT (professional wrestling)

You have violated the 3 revert rule on the article DDT (professional wrestling). Please do not do so, and instead discuss changes with others you may disagree with. If you revert again, you will be blocked. Prodego ^talk 02:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The removal of the warning is prohibited.--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 02:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

see Wikipedia:Vandalism--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 02:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

If the user manages to post an unblock notice properly (he may just have decided that it would be easier to switch IP again), let me just say that I thought I was going to have to defend the block - but the contents of this user talk page (and history) do that for me. (Admins still in doubt will find it useful to compare with the history of the talk pages of the other IP(s) blocked for edit warring.) --Sam Blanning^(talk) 03:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Unblock Request

Talk Page Blanking

Please not that it is not advisable to blank your talk page. I am otherwise not becoming involved with your issue and have in fact been leaving your unblock request in place. --Thisisbossi 04:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Next, when you do Blank, it will receive a posting block for 6 months.--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 04:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for disruption

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Gwernol 15:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 22:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]