Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Z.Spy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Z.Spy

This candidate has withdrawn from the race; please do not vote. This page is kept primarily for historical reasons. Thank you!

I am running for Arbitration comittee because I am a responsible contributor who reverts Vandalism, assists new editors, and Makes sure that Wikipedia is a clean, accurate Encyclopedia. I no longer state political opinons in Talk Pages.

Questions

Support

1. Support. --Kefalonia 09:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose. Too new. Ambi 00:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
3. Michael Snow 00:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose. Mo0[talk] 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose inexperience. David | explanation | Talk 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
6. Oppose, lack of experience. --Interiot 00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
7. Zach ^{(Smack Back) Fair use policy} 00:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
8. Cryptic (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
9. Oppose. Madame Sosostris 00:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
10. Oppose. Crunch 03:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
11. Oppose. Antandrus (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
12. Oppose - Inexperience - Mackensen (talk) 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
13. —Kirill Lokshin 00:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
14. Oppose. --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
15. --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
16. Oppose — Omegatron 01:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
17. Oppose. Inexperience, and statement reads more like a Request for Adminship. Batmanand 01:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
18. Oppose for lack of experience --Angelo 02:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
19. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

    Oppose - inexperience - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

    Account too new (created December 28, 2005 [1]). — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 03:29, Jan. 9, 2006

20. Oppose, experience —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
21. Reluctantly oppose as amount of experience really does matter in this kind of role. Jonathunder 02:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
22. Oppose. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 03:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
23. Oppose Too new. Good luck with future contributions. 172 03:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
24. Oppose. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
25. Bobet 04:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
26. Oppose. Too inexperienced. Paul August ☎ 04:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
27. Oppose. (finally, the last candidate)--ragesoss 04:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
28. Oppose. Need to demonstrate a lot more knowledge about WP before taking on such a big role. novacatz 04:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
29. Oppose. Agree with novacatz. 青い(Aoi) 05:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
30. Oppose. Nothing personal; inexperience. --Muchness 05:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
31. Oppose--cj | talk 06:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
32. Oppose. android79 06:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
33. Oppose. Inexperience issues for this vote. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
34. Oppose. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 07:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
35. Oppose. -- Michalis Famelis 10:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
36. Oppose: Too little is known about Z.spy's ideas about the arbcom's direction, plus inexperience. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 11:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
37. Oppose. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
38. —Nightstallion (?) 12:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
39. Oppose Meekohi 13:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
40. Oppose sorry but I must oppose.  ALKIVAR™ 13:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
41. Another sparkly oppose vote, per inexperience as cited by everyone else. Tomer^talk 14:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
42. — Dunc|☺ 14:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
43. Oppose.  Grue  14:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
44. Oppose, xp. Radiant_>|< 14:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
45. Oppose. --Viriditas 15:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
46. Oppose, lack of experience. the wub "?!" ^{RFR - a good idea?} 17:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
47. Oppose. Please stay a responsible editor, but that alone is not enough to be a good candidate for ArbComm.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 17:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
48. Oppose, xp --kingboyk 19:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
49. Oppose. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-09 21:32Z
50. Oppose - needs experience. Awolf002 22:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
51. Oppose - Inexperienced. --EMS | Talk 22:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
52. Oppose Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
53. Splash^talk 23:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
54. Oppose. Too new to be familiar enough with policy, etc. Hermione1980 23:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
55. Oppose Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
56. older≠wiser 03:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)